Hypatia 27 (3):651-669 (2012)
|Abstract||Over the last twenty years, wildlife biologists and transportation planners have worked with environmental groups and state and tribal governments to mitigate the effects of human transportation arteries on animal habitats and movements. This paper draws connections between this growing field of road ecology and feminist science studies in order to accomplish two things. First, it aims to highlight the often unacknowledged roots that the interdisciplinary field of animal studies has in feminist theory. Second, it seeks to contribute to conversations in the humanities and social sciences on roadkill and on wildlife biology by steering us into a world of practice that foregrounds mundane details. I approach this topic through interdisciplinary methods, including interviews with tribal and state wildlife biologists and participation in fieldwork on a western painted turtle tagging project. Although engaging in science and formulating policy are often understandably regarded by nonspecialists as practices that distance observers from their topic, in the world of roadkill prevention, I argue that the opposite is the case. What I call “intimate bureaucracies” are formed: arrangements of papers, policies, and people that bring a world of counting, and accountability, into being|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nicola Ansell (2001). Producing Knowledge About 'Third World Women': The Politics of Fieldwork in a Zimbabwean Secondary School. Ethics, Place and Environment 4 (2):101 – 116.
Daphne Meadmore & Colin Symes (1997). Keeping Up Appearances: Uniform Policy for School Diversity? British Journal of Educational Studies 45 (2):174 - 186.
Peter R. Grahame & Kamini Maraj Grahame (2009). Points of Departure: Insiders, Outsiders, and Social Relations in Caribbean Field Research. Human Studies 32 (3).
Keren Rice (2006). Ethical Issues in Linguistic Fieldwork: An Overview. Journal of Academic Ethics 4 (1-4).
Marlene de Laine (2000). Fieldwork, Participation and Practice: Ethics and Dilemmas in Qualitative Research. Sage.
I. C. Jarvie (1967). On Theories of Fieldwork and the Scientific Character of Social Anthropology. Philosophy of Science 34 (3):223-242.
Ann Herda-Rapp & Theresa L. Goedeke (eds.) (2005). Mad About Wildlife: Looking at Social Conflict Over Wildlife. Brill.
Edward C. Page & Bill Jenkins (2005). Policy Bureaucracy: Government with a Cast of Thousands. OUP Oxford.
Matthew L. M. Fletcher, Looking to the East: The Stories of Modern Indian People and the Development of Tribal Law.
Robert Frodeman (2005). The Role of Humanities Policy in Public Science. Environmental Philosophy 2 (1):5-13.
Piran C. L. White & Alastair I. Ward, Interdisciplinary Approaches for the Management of Existing and Emerging Human-Wildlife Conflicts.
Anne Herrmann & Abigail J. Stewart (eds.) (1994). Theorizing Feminism: Parallel Trends in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Westview Press.
Mikael Stenmark (2009). The Relevance of Environmental Ethical Theories for Policy Making. In Ben A. Minteer (ed.), Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy. Temple University Press.
Anthony O'Hear (2012). Education and the Modern State. Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):322-335.
Added to index2012-05-10
Total downloads4 ( #178,434 of 548,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,438 of 548,969 )
How can I increase my downloads?