David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):667-683 (2000)
This paper surveys three controversial new directions in research about the nature of science and briefly summarizes both the intellectual and sociological impact of this work. A bibliographic introduction to the major literature is provided and some fruitful directions for future research are proposed. Philosophers of science are also exhorted to perform 'community service' by correcting misunderstandings of the methods of science fostered by these new approaches
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Maarten Boudry & Filip Buekens (2011). The Epistemic Predicament of a Pseudoscience: Social Constructivism Confronts Freudian Psychoanalysis. Theoria 77 (2):159-179.
Adrian Haddock (2004). Rethinking the “Strong Programme” in the Sociology of Knowledge. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (1):19-40.
John Paley (2005). Error and Objectivity: Cognitive Illusions and Qualitative Research. Nursing Philosophy 6 (3):196-209.
M. A. Paley (2005). Error and Objectivity: Cognitive Illusions and Qualitative Research. Nursing Philosophy 6 (3):196–209.
Similar books and articles
Keith S. Taber (2006). Constructivism's New Clothes: The Trivial, the Contingent, and a Progressive Research Programme Into the Learning of Science. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2):189-219.
Lisa Weasel (2001). Dismantling the Self/Other Dichotomy in Science: Towards a Feminist Model of the Immune System. Hypatia 16 (1):27-44.
Catherine E. Milne, The Pedagogical Implications of Teacher Personal Philosophies of Science in the School Science Classroom : An Interpretive Study.
Edward G. Slingerland (2008). What Science Offers the Humanities: Integrating Body and Culture. Cambridge University Press.
Helmut Schwegler (2001). Physics Develops Unaffected by Constructivism. Foundations of Science 6 (4):241-253.
Janet A. Kourany (2010). Philosophy of Science After Feminism. Oxford University Press.
Charles Upton (2001). The System of Antichrist: Truth & Falsehood in Postmodernism and the New Age. Sophia Perennis.
Jacquelyn N. Zita (1988). Review: A Review Essay. The Feminist Question of the Science Question in Feminism: A Critical Analysis of Sandra Harding's "The Science Question in Feminism". [REVIEW] Hypatia 3 (1):157 - 168.
Nick Huggett (2000). Local Philosophies of Science. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):137.
Solly Zuckerman Zuckerman (1967). Scientists and War. New York, Harper & Row.
Kristina Rolin (2004). Three Decades of Feminism in Science: From "Liberal Feminism" and "Difference Feminism" to Gender Analysis of Science. [REVIEW] Hypatia 19 (1):292 - 296.
A. Scholl (2010). Radical Constructivism in Communication Science. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):51-57.
Mary Jo Nye (2011). Michael Polanyi and His Generation: Origins of the Social Construction of Science. The University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads64 ( #36,359 of 1,699,648 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #206,271 of 1,699,648 )
How can I increase my downloads?