Rosenberg's un-kind remarks about social science
Inquiry 25 (4):471 – 477 (1982)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Alexander Rosenberg (1990). Moral Realism and Social Science. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 15 (1):150-166.
Roland Puccetti (1976). Reply to Martin and Rosenberg. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (March):139-141.
Stabler Jr (1982). Book Review:Sociobiology and the Preemption of Social Science Alexander Rosenberg. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 49 (4):648-.
Stabler Jr (1982). Book Review:Sociobiology and the Preemption of Social Science Alexander Rosenberg. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 49 (4):648-.
Alexander Rosenberg (1995). Philosophy of Social Science. Westview Press.
Alex Voorhoeve (2001). Review of Alex Rosenberg's Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction. Routledge, London, 2000. Pp. 191. For Philosophy Today, 2001. [REVIEW] Philosophy Today 14:8-9.
Alexander Rosenberg (1992). Economics: Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? University of Chicago Press.
Alexander Rosenberg (2000). Darwinism in Philosophy, Social Science, and Policy. Cambridge University Press.
Douglas W. Hands (1984). What Economics is Not: An Economist's Response to Rosenberg. Philosophy of Science 51 (3):495-503.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-03-05Total downloads1 ( #277,212 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |

