David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Constellations 7 (3):408-429 (2000)
The past twenty years have witnessed the consolidation of deliberation as the normative basis of democratic theory. Although different versions of deliberative democracy vary in scope and degree of institutionalization, they share the assumption that the rational consensus engendered through discussion should serve as the normative guide for democratic politics. Although this tradition has roots in the birth of bourgeois liberal thought, it has received renewed attention due to Habermas’s reformulation on the basis of discourse ethics. In his middle period, Habermas had attempted to ground rationality in the structure of discourse itself, in the ideal preconditions of intersubjective communication.1 His more pragmatist heirs, however, jettison transcendental truth claims while maintaining that deliberation can enhance the legitimacy of consensual solutions to the moral dilemmas which divide citizens
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Eoin Daly (2016). Principle, Discretion, and Symbolic Power in Rousseau's Account of Judicial Virtue. Ratio Juris 29 (2):223-245.
Christian Rostbøll (2009). Dissent, Criticism, and Transformative Political Action in Deliberative Democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (1):19-36.
Clarissa Rile Hayward (2004). Doxa and Deliberation. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (1):1-24.
Similar books and articles
Gregory F. Pappas (spring 2008). "John Dewey and the Contemporary 'Deliberative Turn' in Political Theory," Southwest Philosophical Studies 30 , 71-78. [REVIEW] Southwest Philosophical Studies 30 (Spring 2008), 71-78 30:71-78.
James Fishkin (2005). Defending Deliberation: A Comment on Ian Shapiro's The State of Democratic Theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (1):71-78.
Alison Kadlec (0040). Critical Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. Theoria (=117;User_Persona=false;ord=1234):54-80.
John S. Dryzek (2005). Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia. Political Theory 33 (2):218 - 242.
Joshua Cohen (2009). Philosophy, Politics, Democracy: Selected Essays. Harvard University Press.
Joseph Femia (1996). Complexity and Deliberative Democracy. Inquiry 39 (3 & 4):359 – 397.
Robert B. Talisse (2004). Does Public Ignorance Defeat Deliberative Democracy? Critical Review 16 (4):455-463.
Thom Brooks (2009). A Critique of Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 50-54.
Griffin Trotter (2006). Bioethics and Deliberative Democracy: Five Warnings From Hobbes. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (3):235 – 250.
James Fishkin (2009). When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. OUP Oxford.
M. Bacon (2010). The Politics of Truth: A Critique of Peircean Deliberative Democracy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (9):1075-1091.
Philip Pettit (2004). Depoliticizing Democracy. Ratio Juris 17 (1):52-65.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads39 ( #105,511 of 1,907,384 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #160,519 of 1,907,384 )
How can I increase my downloads?