Asian Philosophy 20 (2):141-158 (2011)
|Abstract||This article deals with Li Tongxuan's explication of the Avata asaka-s tra in terms of the Sinification of Buddhism. While the affirmation of the present human condition is shared by other Chinese Huayan masters as well, this attitude is most evident in Li Tongxuan's explication of the scripture where the Chinese symbolisms such as yin-yang and five phases are amply employed. For him, every scriptural description on ordinary objects and names, especially directions, had profound religious implications. In order to reveal these meanings in a lively and concrete language, the lay exegete Li Tongxuan freely alluded to the non-Buddhist ideas when elucidating or justifying the scriptural phrases. Although his interpretation sometimes resulted in a forced one, his intuitive adoption of the indigenous philosophy served to illumine the vision that an ordinary human condition is the foundation of the ultimate realization|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Wai-Ming Ng (1998). The Yin-Yang-Wu-Hsing Doctrine in the Textual Tradition of Tokugawa Japanese Agriculture. Asian Philosophy 8 (2):119 – 128.
Brook Ziporyn (2008). Form, Principle, Pattern, or Coherence? Li in Chinese Philosophy. Philosophy Compass 3 (3):401–422.
Anna Ghiglione (2009). Deception in Chinese Buddhist Thinking : Reflections From the Lotus Sutra and the Vimalakirti Sutra. In Leslie Anne Boldt-Irons, Corrado Federici & Ernesto Virgulti (eds.), Disguise, Deception, Trompe-L'oeil: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Peter Lang.
Douglas Osto (2009). The Supreme Array Scripture: A New Interpretation of the Title “Gaṇḍavyūha-Sūtra”. Journal of Indian Philosophy 37 (3).
Andoni Ibarra & Thomas Mormann (1988). La Explicación Del Concepto de Reducción. Theoria 4 (1):139-161.
Hilary Putnam (1957). Psychological Concepts, Explication, and Ordinary Language. Journal of Philosophy 54 (February):94-99.
Roger J. Corless (1975). The Meaning of Ching (Sütra?) In Buddhist Chinese. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 3 (1):67-72.
Patrick Maher (2007). Explication Defended. Studia Logica 86 (2):331 - 341.
Joseph F. Hanna (1968). An Explication of 'Explication'. Philosophy of Science 35 (1):28-44.
Added to index2010-08-11
Total downloads9 ( #113,941 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?