David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2):283–310 (2003)
This paper consists of four sections. The first section considers what the proof of necessitarianism in Spinoza's system requires. Also in the first section, Jonathan Bennett's (1984) reading of 1p16 as involving a commitment to necessitarianism is presented and accepted. The second section evaluates Bennett's suggestion how Spinoza might have been led to conclude necessitarianism from his basic assumptions. The third section of the paper is devoted to Don Garrett's (1991) interpretation of Spinoza's proof. I argue that Bennett's and Garrett's interpretations of Spinoza's necessitarianism have short-comings which justify an attempt to offer an alternative proof. In the proof given in the fourth section, it is argued that Spinoza derived necessitarianism from the conjunction of the following principles: (i) necessary existence of the substances; (ii) substance-property ontology; (iii) superessentialism; and (iv) the 'no shared attribute' thesis
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Merrihew Adams (1994). Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford University Press.
John Carriero (1991). Spinoza's Views on Necessity in Historical Perspective. Philosophical Topics 19 (1):47-96.
E. M. Curley (1969). Spinoza's Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
René Descartes (1984). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Cambridge University Press.
Kant Immanuel (1998). Critique of Pure Reason ; Translated and Edited by Paul Guyer, Allen W. Wood. Cambridge.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alexander Bird (2004). Strong Necessitarianism: The Nomological Identity of Possible Worlds. Ratio 17 (3):256–276.
Michael Della Rocca (2008). Spinoza. Routledge.
Andrew Chignell (2012). Kant, Real Possibility, and the Threat of Spinoza. Mind 121 (483):635-675.
Martin Lin (2007). Spinoza's Arguments for the Existence of God. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):269-297.
Pierfrancesco Basile (2012). Russell on Spinoza's Substance Monism. Metaphysica 13 (1):27-41.
Ross P. Cameron (2005). Truthmaker Necessitarianism and Maximalism. Logique Et Analyse 48 (189-192):43-56.
Michael V. Griffin (2008). Necessitarianism in Spinoza and Leibniz. In Charles Huenemann (ed.), Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Chris Mortensen (1989). Anything is Possible. Erkenntnis 30 (3):319 - 337.
Martin Lin (2012). Rationalism and Necessitarianism. Noûs 46 (3):418-448.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #56,162 of 1,139,956 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #66,126 of 1,139,956 )
How can I increase my downloads?