David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The problem of justice lies at the heart of the philosophy of jurisprudence. Then what justice does, the purpose for which a legal system exists, the central principle of jurisprudence, is to provide, for concrete cases, a basis for decisions as to what is just. In the lecture I will first of all deal with Kant's ideas about justice, as shown in his works. They can also be seen as examples of a concept of justice from a previous epoch. The magnitude of these distances will become apparent when one bears in mind what Kant meant, and in what context, when he used this concept. At the same time Kant is the thinker who is most often mentioned in the contemporary discourse on justice. This is for two reasons. Firstly, Kant's position is exemplary for that position that holds that justice is the trancendental centre of any theory of jurisprudence; secondly, Kant is seen as the most significant thinker of that epoch, which is seen as the starting point for the present: the modern European Enlightenment. Finally I would like to contrast the concept of justice which has been developed in this way with the concept that seems fitting for the concrete situation of the Istanbul Congress of 2003
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hennie Lötter (1999). Rawls, Young, and the Scope of Justice. Theoria 46 (94):90-107.
Xunwu Chen (2009). Justice: The Neglected Argument and the Pregnant Vision. Asian Philosophy 19 (2):189 – 198.
David Johnston (2011). A Brief History of Justice. Wiley-Blackwell.
Chelsea Luthringer (2000). So What is Justice Anyway? Rosen Pub. Group.
Wojciech Sadurski (1984). Social Justice and Legal Justice. Law and Philosophy 3 (3):329 - 354.
Jacob Weinrib (2014). Permissive Laws and the Dynamism of Kantian Justice. Law and Philosophy 33 (1):105-136.
William Martin (1999). Aristotle and Posner on Corrective Justice. Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (4):651-657.
Susanne Lettow (2006). The Value of Justice. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:183-187.
Emmanuel Renault (2005). Radical Democracy and an Abolitionist Concept of Justice. A Critique of Habermas' Theory of Justice. Critical Horizons 6 (1):137-152.
Roberto Alejandro (1998). The Limits of Rawlsian Justice. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ronnie Lippens (ed.) (2004). Imaginary Boundaries of Justice: Social Justice Across Disciplines. Hart.
Otfried Höffe (2006). Kant's Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace. Cambridge University Press.
Kenneth M. Ehrenberg (2003). Procedural Justice and Information in Conflict-Resolving Institutions. Albany Law Review 67:167-209.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads2 ( #354,406 of 1,102,846 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #296,987 of 1,102,846 )
How can I increase my downloads?