David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 175 (3):351 - 367 (2010)
The article deals with Cantor's argument for the non-denumerability of reals somewhat in the spirit of Lakatos' logic of mathematical discovery. At the outset Cantor's proof is compared with some other famous proofs such as Dedekind's recursion theorem, showing that rather than usual proofs they are resolutions to do things differently. Based on this I argue that there are "ontologically" safer ways of developing the diagonal argument into a full-fledged theory of continuum, concluding eventually that famous semantic paradoxes based on diagonal construction are caused by superficial understanding of what a name is
|Keywords||Continuum Linguistic turn Diagonal argument Reference Richard’s paradox Constructivist mathematics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert B. Brandom (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard University Press.
W. V. Quine (1960). Word and Object. The MIT Press.
Imre Lakatos (ed.) (1976). Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Cambridge University Press.
Stewart Shapiro (1991). Foundations Without Foundationalism: A Case for Second-Order Logic. Oxford University Press.
A. S. Troelstra (1988). Constructivism in Mathematics: An Introduction. Sole Distributors for the U.S.A. And Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
Citations of this work BETA
Vojtěch Kolman (2015). Logicism as Making Arithmetic Explicit. Erkenntnis 80 (3):487-503.
Similar books and articles
Christopher Menzel (1984). Cantor and the Burali-Forti Paradox. The Monist 67 (1):92-107.
Anne Newstead (2001). Aristotle and Modern Mathematical Theories of the Continuum. In Demetra Sfendoni-Mentzou & James Brown (eds.), Aristotle and Contemporary Philosophy of Science. Peter Lang
Andrew Bacon (2013). Curry's Paradox and Omega Inconsistency. Studia Logica 101 (1):1-9.
Gregory H. Moore (2011). Early History of the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis: 1878—1938. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 17 (4):489-532.
Matthew E. Moore (2007). The Genesis of the Peircean Continuum. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (3):425 - 469.
Edward G. Belaga (forthcoming). Retrieving the Mathematical Mission of the Continuum Concept From the Transfinitely Reductionist Debris of Cantor’s Paradise. Extended Abstract. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics.
Miriam Franchella (2000). Towards a Re-Evaluation of Julius König's Contribution to Logic. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (1):45-66.
Kai Hauser (2002). Is Cantor's Continuum Problem Inherently Vague? Philosophia Mathematica 10 (3):257-285.
Added to index2009-04-20
Total downloads50 ( #90,731 of 1,938,800 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #100,512 of 1,938,800 )
How can I increase my downloads?