Neuroethics 1 (2) (2008)
|Abstract||Emerging technologies raise the possibility that we may be able to treat trauma victims by pharmaceutically dampening factual or emotional aspects of their memories. Such technologies raise a panoply of legal and ethical issues. While many of these issues remain off in the distance, some have already arisen. In this brief commentary, I discuss a real-life case of memory erasure. The case reveals why the contours of our freedom of memory—our limited bundle of rights to control our memories and be free of outside control—already merit some attention.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Charles Scott (1999). Memory of Time in the Light of Flesh. Continental Philosophy Review 32 (4):421-432.
John Sutton (2010). Observer Perspective and Acentred Memory: Some Puzzles About Point of View in Personal Memory. Philosophical Studies 148 (1).
Kate Booth (2008). Risdon Vale: Place, Memory, and Suburban Experience. Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (3):299 – 311.
John Sutton (1998). Philosophy and Memory Traces: Descartes to Connectionism. Cambridge University Press.
David Kovacs (2009). Memory and Imagery in Russell's The Analysis of Mind. Prolegomena 8 (2):193-206.
R. Joseph (2003). Emotional Trauma and Childhood Amnesia. Consciousness and Emotion 4 (2):151-179.
Anne P. DePrince, Carolyn B. Allard, Hannah Oh & Jennifer J. Freyd (2004). What's in a Name for Memory Errors? Implications and Ethical Issues Arising From the Use of the Term "False Memory" for Errors in Memory for Details. Ethics and Behavior 14 (3):201 – 233.
S. Matthew Liao & Anders Sandberg (2008). The Normativity of Memory Modification. Neuroethics 1 (2).
Adam J. Kolber (2006). Therapeutic Forgetting: The Legal and Ethical Implications of Memory Dampening. Vanderbilt Law Review 59 (5):1561-1626.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #67,558 of 549,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?