Scanlon's investigation: The relevance of intent to permissibility1

Analytic Philosophy 52 (2):100-123 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Silencing Desires?Attila Tanyi - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (3):887-903.
Scanlon’s Contractualism.R. Jay Wallace - 2002 - Ethics 112 (3):429-470.
Scanlon on Social and Material Inequality.Jonathan Wolff - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4):406-425.
Scanlon on Permissibility and Double Effect.Jakob Elster - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):75-102.
Scanlon on Double Effect. [REVIEW]Ralph Wedgwood - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2):464-472.
Moral dimensions: permissibility, meaning, blame.Thomas Scanlon - 2008 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-09-23

Downloads
248 (#78,493)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Niko Kolodny
University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

What Makes Threats Wrong?Niko Kolodny - 2017 - Analytic Philosophy 58 (2):87-118.
Legal obligation and reasons.Christopher Essert - 2013 - Legal Theory 19 (1):63-88.
Blameworthiness and constitutive control.Rachel Achs - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (12):3695-3715.
Considering Intentions in Decision Making: What Is So Odd about It?Anton Markoč - 2017 - Journal of Social Philosophy 48 (4):481-498.
Political Anti-Intentionalism.Matthias Brinkmann - 2018 - Res Publica 24 (2):159-179.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations