We all are rembrandt experts – or, how task dissociations in school learning effects support the discontinuity hypothesis
Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):381-382 (1999)
|Abstract||We argue that cognitive penetration in non-early vision extends beyond the special situations considered by Pylyshyn. Many situations which do not involve difficult stimuli or require expert skills nevertheless load on high-level cognitive processes. School learning effects illustrate this point: they provide a way to observe task dissociations which support the discontinuity hypothesis, but they show that the scope of visual cognition in our visual experience is often underestimated.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul T. Sowden (1999). Expert Perceivers and Perceptual Learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):396-397.
Frank C. Keil (2008). How to Learn Multiple Tasks. Biological Theory 3 (1).
Eyal M. Reingold & Jeffrey Toth (1996). Process Dissociations Versus Task Dissociations: A Controversy in Progress. In G. Underwood (ed.), Implicit Cognition. Oxford University Press.
Sam Rakover (1993). Empirical Criteria for Task Susceptibility to Introspective Awareness and Awareness Effects. Philosophical Psychology 6 (4):451 – 467.
A. Richardson-Klavehn, John M. Gardiner & R. I. Java (1996). Memory: Task Dissociations, Process Dissociations and Dissociations of Consciousness. In G. Underwood (ed.), Implicit Cognition. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #292,563 of 739,375 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,375 )
How can I increase my downloads?