Why Be Disposed to Be Coherent?
Ethics 118 (3):437-463 (2008)
| Abstract | My subject is what I will call the “Myth of Formal Coherence.” In its normative telling, the Myth is that there are “requirements of formal coherence as such,” which demand just that our beliefs and intentions be formally coherent.1 Some examples are. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFranz Dietrich & Luca Moretti (2005). On Coherent Sets and the Transmission of Confirmation. Philosophy of Science 73(3) 72 (3):403-424.
Peter Murphy, Coherentism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Gregory Wheeler & Richard Scheines (forthcoming). Coherence and Confirmation Through Causation. Mind.
Gregory Wheeler & Richard Scheines (forthcoming). Coherence and Confirmation Through Causation. Mind.
Charles B. Cross (1995). Probability, Evidence, and the Coherence of the Whole Truth. Synthese 103 (2):153 - 170.
Niko Kolodny (2007). IX-How Does Coherence Matter? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107 (1pt3):229-263.
Niko Kolodny (2008). The Myth of Practical Consistency. European Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):366-402.
Charles B. Cross (1999). Coherence and Truth Conducive Justification. Analysis 59 (263):186–193.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads84 ( #8,840 of 548,970 )Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #8,782 of 548,970 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
