Review of Kenneth Liberman, dialectical practice in tibetan philosophical culture: An ethnomethodological inquiry into formal reasoning [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sophia 48 (4):513-515 (2009)
Chapters 4–9 are the most important part of the book. Here Liberman displays his interpretive skills to the fullest. He explores various aspects of directly observed, live debate processes, drawing on the work of Schutz, Husserl, Durkheim (to mention just a few), as well as Buddhist thinkers Nagarjuna, Sakya Pandita, Tsongkhapa, and others. Liberman exhaustively explains the organization and mechanics of debates, the public nature of reasoning, negative dialectics employed by debaters, strategies and techniques such as absurd consequences, hand-claps, ridicule, and repetition, and other matters.
|Keywords||Philosophy Buddhism Tibetan culture Buddhist dialectics Debate practices Ethnomethodology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kenneth Liberman (1991). The Grammatology of Emptiness. International Philosophical Quarterly 31 (4):435-448.
Jonathan Stoltz (2006). Sakya Pandita and the Status of Concepts. Philosophy East and West 56 (4):567-582.
Kenneth Liberman (2008). Review: Husserl's Phenomenology of Scientific Reason. [REVIEW] Human Studies 31 (3):343 - 353.
Kenneth Liberman (1995). The Hermeneutics of Formal Analytics. International Philosophical Quarterly 35 (2):129-140.
Kenneth Liberman (2002). The Other in Tibetan Buddhism. In Steven Shankman & Massimo Lollini (eds.), Who, Exactly, is the Other ?: Western and Transcultural Perspectives: A Collection of Essays. University of Oregon Books/University of Oregon Humanities Center
Lars Frers (2008). Kenneth Liberman, Husserl's Criticism of Reason: With Ethnomethodological Specifications. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 24 (2):159-166.
Fred R. Dallmayr (2006). Kenneth Liberman on Tibetan Debating Practice. Human Studies 29 (3):381 - 386.
Kenneth Liberman (1996). “Universal Reason” as a Local Organizational Method: Announcement of a Study. [REVIEW] Human Studies 19 (3):289 - 301.
D. Lawrence Wieder (2006). Remarks on Ken Liberman's Dialectical Practice in Tibetan Philosophical Culture: An Ethnomethodological Inquiry Into Formal Reasoning. Human Studies 29 (3):387 - 392.
Added to index2009-07-29
Total downloads28 ( #141,015 of 1,907,527 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #274,312 of 1,907,527 )
How can I increase my downloads?