David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Human Studies 29 (3):341 - 362 (2006)
In this paper, we discuss the problem of communist power in so called totalitarian regimes. Inspired by strategies of explanation in contemporary science studies and by the ethnomethodological conception of social order, we suggest that the power of communists is not to be taken as an unproblematic source of explanation; rather, we take this power as something that is itself in need of being explained. We study personal narratives on political screenings that took place in Czechoslovakia in 1970 and analyze how the power of communists obtained its strength from ordinary and “unremarkable” interactions between participants. The screenings are interpreted, in the terms of Bruno Latour, as “trials of strength.” We show that it was crucial for all the participants that associations, translations or mobilizations involved in making the regime real, remained partial and multiple, and not exclusive and “total” as is often assumed within dominant discourses on totalitarianism.
|Keywords||actor-network theory communism Czechoslovakia ethnomethodology political screenings power totalitarianism trials of strength|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Bruno Latour (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press.
Michael Lynch (1993). Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge University Press.
James C. Scott (1999). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Utopian Studies 10 (2):310-312.
George Psathas (1999). Studying the Organization in Action: Membership Categorization and Interaction Analysis. [REVIEW] Human Studies 22 (2-4):139-162.
Peter Beilharz (2002). Modernity and Communism: Zygmunt Bauman and the Other Totalitarianism. Thesis Eleven 70 (1):88-99.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David R. Hiley (1987). Power and Values in Corporate Life. Journal of Business Ethics 6 (5):343 - 353.
Aaron Smuts (2008). 'The Little People': Power and the Worshipable. In Lester Hunt & Noel Carroll (eds.), The Twilight Zone and Philosophy. Blackwell
David E. Nelson (1996). Confirmation, Explanation, and Logical Strength. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (3):399-413.
Alfred R. Mele (1998). Motivational Strength. Noûs 32 (1):23-36.
Teresa Lacerda (2011). From Ode to Sport To Contemporary Aesthetic Categories of Sport: Strength Considered as an Aesthetic Category. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (4):447 - 456.
Russell Hardin (1996). Russell's Power. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26 (3):322-347.
Thomas Glass (1996). On Power Set in Explicit Mathematics. Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (2):468-489.
Edmund Henden (2008). What is Self-Control? Philosophical Psychology 21 (1):69 – 90.
Antonio Negri (2009). Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State. University of Minnesota Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #393,885 of 1,906,922 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,570 of 1,906,922 )
How can I increase my downloads?