A new look at the cosmological argument

American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (2):193 - 211 (1997)
Abstract
The cosmological argument for God’s existence has a long history, but perhaps the most influential version of it has been the argument from contingency. This is the version that Frederick Copleston pressed upon Bertrand Russell in their famous debate about God’s existence in 1948 (printed in Russell’s 1957 Why I am not a Christian). Russell’s lodges three objections to the Thomistic argument.
Keywords cosmological argument  theism  mereology  defeasible reasoning
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,768
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Joshua Rasmussen (2009). From a Necessary Being to God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (1):1 - 13.
Joshua Rasmussen (2010). A New Argument for a Necessary Being. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):351 - 356.

View all 8 citations

Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-08-06

Total downloads

166 ( #3,980 of 1,098,973 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

35 ( #2,441 of 1,098,973 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.