A new look at the cosmological argument

American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (2):193 - 211 (1997)
The cosmological argument for God’s existence has a long history, but perhaps the most influential version of it has been the argument from contingency. This is the version that Frederick Copleston pressed upon Bertrand Russell in their famous debate about God’s existence in 1948 (printed in Russell’s 1957 Why I am not a Christian). Russell’s lodges three objections to the Thomistic argument.
Keywords cosmological argument  theism  mereology  defeasible reasoning
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/20009892
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,831
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Christopher Gregory Weaver (forthcoming). Yet Another New Cosmological Argument. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion:1-21.
Joshua Rasmussen (2013). Continuity as a Guide to Possibility. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (3):525-538.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

253 ( #3,750 of 1,724,750 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

17 ( #45,495 of 1,724,750 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.