David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):694 - 727 (2007)
: The revival of philosophical pragmatism has generated a wealth of intramural debates between neopragmatists like Richard Rorty and contemporary scholars devoted to explicating the classical pragmatism of John Dewey and William James. Of all these internecine conflicts, the most divisive concerns the status of language and experience in pragmatist philosophy. Contemporary scholars of classical pragmatism defend experience as the heart of pragmatism while neopragmatists drop the concept of experience in favor of a thoroughly linguistic pragmatism. I argue that both positions engender formidable risks. After discussing the present impasse, I describe a third version of pragmatism which involves a reconstruction of the classical pragmatist concept of experience in light of the criticisms of foundationalism crucial to the neopragmatist linguistic turn. This third version of pragmatism does justice to both Rorty and Dewey by focusing on experience as a temporal field
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
C. A. J. Coady (2010). John Dewey's Ethics: Democracy as Experience. Contemporary Political Theory 9 (2):251-253.
Shane Ralston (2010). John Dewey's Ethics: Democracy as Experience. Contemporary Political Theory 9 (2):251.
Shane J. Ralston (2011). The Linguistic-Pragmatic Turn in the History of Philosophy. Human Affairs 21 (3):280-293.
Scott Aikin (2009). Pragmatism, Experience, and the Given. Human Affairs 19 (1).
Similar books and articles
John D. Arras (2001). Freestanding Pragmatism in Law and Bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (2):69-85.
Joseph W. Long (2002). Who's a Pragmatist: Distinguishing Epistemic Pragmatism and Contextualism. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 16 (1):39-49.
Bart Schultz (1999). Comment: The Private and its Problems-Pragmatism, Pragmatist Feminism, and Homophobia. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (2):281-305.
Tadeusz Szubka (2012). On the Very Idea of Brandom's Pragmatism. Philosophia 40 (1):165-174.
David L. Hildebrand (2003). Beyond Realism and Antirealism: John Dewey and the Neopragmatists. Vanderbilt University Press.
Larry A. Hickman (2007). Pragmatism as Post-Postmodernism: Lessons From John Dewey. Fordham University Press.
Charles A. Hobbs (2011). Why Classical American Pragmatism is Helpful for Thinking About Death. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (2):182-195.
Robert Brandom (2011). Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary. Harvard University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #42,241 of 1,101,027 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #81,070 of 1,101,027 )
How can I increase my downloads?