David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Behavior 12 (1):75 – 86 (2002)
CABLES is both an acronym and metaphor for conceptualizing research participation risk by considering 6 distinct domains in which risks of harm to research participants may exist: cognitive, affective, biological, legal, economic, and social/cultural. These domains are described and illustrated, along with suggestions for minimizing or eliminating the potential hazards to human participants in biomedical and behavioral science research. Adoption of a thoughtful ethical analysis addressing all 6 CABLES strands in designing research provides a strong protective step toward safeguarding and promoting the well-being of study participants.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Joan E. Sieber (forthcoming). Planning Ethically Responsible Research: A Guide for Students and Internal Review Boards. Ethics.
George J. Annas & Michael A. Grodin (1992). The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code Human Rights in Human Experimentation. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Celia B. Fisher & Scyatta A. Wallace (2000). Through the Community Looking Glass: Reevaluating the Ethical and Policy Implications of Research on Adolescent Risk and Psychopathology. Ethics and Behavior 10 (2):99 – 118.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David Wendler & Christine Grady (2008). What Should Research Participants Understand to Understand They Are Participants in Research? Bioethics 22 (4):203–208.
Dilek Onkal, Cognitive and Emotional Representations of Terror Attacks: A Cross-Cultural Exploration.
Charles Weijer, The Ethical Analysis of Risks and Potential Benefits in Human Subjects Research: History, Theory, and Implications for U.S. Regulation.
Thomas Hadjistavropoulos & William E. Smythe (2001). Elements of Risk in Qualitative Research. Ethics and Behavior 11 (2):163 – 174.
Genevieve Maricle (2011). Prediction as an Impediment to Preparedness: Lessons From the US Hurricane and Earthquake Research Enterprises. Minerva 49 (1):87-111.
Lee Black & Kelly A. McClellan (2011). Familial Communication of Research Results: A Need to Know? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (4):605-613.
Martin Tolich (2009). The Principle of Caveat Emptor: Confidentiality and Informed Consent as Endemic Ethical Dilemmas in Focus Group Research. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):99-108.
David B. Resnik & Darryl C. Zeldin (2008). Environmental Health Research on Hazards in the Home and the Duty to Warn. Bioethics 22 (4):209–217.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #336,475 of 1,906,920 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,570 of 1,906,920 )
How can I increase my downloads?