Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (3):261-273 (2009)
|Abstract||Bioethics is best viewed as both a second-order discipline and also part of public discourse. Since their goals differ, some bioethical activities are more usefully viewed as advancing public discourse than academic disciplines. For example, the “Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights” sponsored by the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization seeks to promote ethical guidance on bioethical issues. From the vantage of philosophical ethics, it fails to rank or specify its stated principles, justify controversial principles, clarify key terms, or say what is meant by calling potentially conflicting norms “foundational.” From the vantage of improving the public discourse about bioethical problems and seeking ethical solutions in the public arena, however, this document may have an important role. The goals and relations between bioethics as a second-order discipline and public discourse are explored|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Elizabeth F. Cooke (2003). On the Possibility of a Pragmatic Discourse Bioethics: Putnam, Habermas, and the Normative Logic of Bioethical Inquiry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (5 & 6):635 – 653.
Loretta M. Kopelman (2006). Bioethics as a Second-Order Discipline: Who is Not a Bioethicist? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):601 – 628.
William Stempsey (2011). Religion and Bioethics: Can We Talk? [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):339-350.
Stephen S. Hanson (2011). Ethics in the Discipline(s) of Bioethics. HEC Forum 23 (3):171-192.
Ruth Levy Guyer & Jonathan D. Moreno (2004). Slouching Toward Policy: Lazy Bioethics and the Perils of Science Fiction. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (4):W14-W17.
Charles C. Camosy (2011). Toward a “Magenta” Public Bioethics Discourse—Bart Stupak and Health Care Reform. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (12):9-12.
Adela Cortina (2009). Bioethics and Public Reason: A Report on Ethics and Public Discourse in Spain. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (03):241-.
Codruţa Cuceu (2011). Milestones in the Critique of the Public Sphere: Dewey and Arendt. Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):99-110.
Albert W. Dzur & Daniel Lessard Levin (2004). The "Nation's Conscience:" Assessing Bioethics Commissions as Public Forums. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):333-360.
Summer Johnson (2007). Making Public Bioethics Sufficiently Public: The Legitimacy and Authority of Bioethics Commissions. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):143-152.
Asaf Bar-Tura (2010). Arendt, Habermas and Facebook: Participation and Discourse in Cyber Public Spheres. Humanities and Technology Review 29:1-25.
Peggy Ruth Geren (2001). Public Discourse: Creating the Conditions for Dialogue Concerning the Common Good in a Postmodern Heterogeneous Democracy. Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (3):191-199.
Summer Johnson (2006). Multiple Roles and Successes in Public Bioethics: A Response to the Public Forum Critique of Bioethics Commissions. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (2):173-188.
Richard John Neuhaus (2008). Human Dignity and Public Discourse. In Adam Schulman (ed.), Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays Commissioned by the President's Council on Bioethics. [President's Council on Bioethics.
John H. Evans (2006). Between Technocracy and Democratic Legitimation: A Proposed Compromise Position for Common Morality Public Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (3):213 – 234.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads3 ( #215,006 of 757,546 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?