Graduate studies at Western
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (4):683-700 (2001)
|Abstract||In his recent book, Explaining Chaos, Peter Smith presents a new problem in the foundations of chaos theory. Specifically, he argues that the standard ways of justifying idealizations in mathematical models fail when it comes to the infinite intricacy found in strange attractors. I argue that Smith's analysis undermines much of the explanatory power of chaos theory. A better approach is developed by drawing analogies from the models found in continuum mechanics.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Fred W. Markham (1998). A Method for Introducing the Concepts of Chaos Theory to Medical Students. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (1):1-4.
Charlotte Werndl (2009). What Are the New Implications of Chaos for Unpredictability? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (1):195-220.
James W. Garson (1995). Chaos and Free Will. Philosophical Psychology 8 (4):365-74.
Bob Hodge (2007). Life, Chaos, and Transdisciplinarity: A Personal Journey. World Futures 63 (3 & 4):209 – 222.
Robert W. Batterman (1993). Defining Chaos. Philosophy of Science 60 (1):43-66.
Stephen H. Kellert (1992). A Philosophical Evaluation of the Chaos Theory "Revolution". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:33 - 49.
James T. Cushing (2000). Bohmian Insights Into Quantum Chaos. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):445.
Yvon Gauthier (2009). The Construction of Chaos Theory. Foundations of Science 14 (3):153-165.
Jeffrey Koperski (2000). God, Chaos, and the Quantum Dice. Zygon 35 (3):545-559.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #62,831 of 740,591 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,591 )
How can I increase my downloads?