A reply to Carol Voeller and Rachel Cohon: “The moral law as the source of normativity” by Carol Voeller "The Roots of Reason" by Rachel Cohon
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
I am going to begin today by bringing together one of the themes of Carol Voeller’s remarks with one of the criticisms raised by Rachel Cohon, because I see them as related, and want to address them together. Voeller argues that the moral law is constitutive of our nature as rational agents. To put it in her own words, “to be the kind of object it is, is for a thing to be under, or constituted by, the laws which are its nature. For Kant, laws are constitutive principles … in something very close to an Aristotelian sense: for Kant, laws are proper to objects1 much as form is to object, for Aristotle.” Voeller believes that the moral law defines the kind of cause that we are, and we are under the moral law because we are that kind of cause. Since the defining quality of a rational agent is that a rational agent acts on its representation - I prefer to say conception - of a law, Voeller thinks the question for Kant is whether we can find a law which just is the law for causes that act on their representations of laws. As she puts it, “The problem, for Kant, is whether there is a law of a cause that acts on norms - on reflection, on its representation of a law. If there is, then the constitutive principle of that cause will be the law normative for it in reflection.” Now Voeller appears to think that I will disagree with this strategy for grounding the moral law, because she sees me as giving an anti-metaphysical or ametaphysical account of Kant’s ethics, in contrast to Kant’s own. But so far, I don’t..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Birgit Schaffar (2014). Changing the Definition of Education. On Kant's Educational Paradox Between Freedom and Restraint. Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (1):5-21.
Klas Roth (2012). Education and a Progressive Orientation Towards a Cosmopolitan Society. Ethics and Education 7 (1):59 - 73.
Similar books and articles
Paul Formosa (2013). Is Kant a Moral Constructivist or a Moral Realist? European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):170-196.
Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2008). Reason, Morality, and Hume's "Active Principles" : Comments on Rachel Cohon's Hume's Morality: Feeling and Fabrication. Hume Studies 34 (2):267-276.
Carol W. Voeller (2001). Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things. Social Theory and Practice 27 (2):352-358.
Rachel Cohon (2008). Hume's Morality: Feeling and Fabrication. Oxford University Press.
Carol W. Voeller (1999). Review: Gregor (Ed & Trans), Immanuel Kant, Critique of Practical Reason. [REVIEW] Ethics 109 (2):444-446.
T. H. Irwin (2011). Continuity in the History of Autonomy. Inquiry 54 (5):442 - 459.
Melissa Zinkin (2006). Respect for the Law and the Use of Dynamical Terms in Kant's Theory of Moral Motivation. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88 (1):31-53.
Don Garrett (2008). Feeling and Fabrication: Rachel Cohon's Hume's Morality. Hume Studies 34 (2):257-266.
Added to index2009-06-19
Total downloads99 ( #45,925 of 1,941,072 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #149,738 of 1,941,072 )
How can I increase my downloads?