David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Biology and Philosophy 26 (3):317-338 (2011)
The common opinion has been that evolution results in the continuing development of more complex forms of life, generally understood as more complex organisms. The arguments supporting that opinion have recently come under scrutiny and been found wanting. Nevertheless, the appearance of increasing complexity remains. So, is there some sense in which evolution does grow complexity? Artificial life simulations have consistently failed to reproduce even the appearance of increasing complexity, which poses a challenge. Simulations, as much as scientific theories, are obligated at least to save the appearances! We suggest a relation between these two problems, understanding biological complexity growth and the failure to model even its appearances. We present a different understanding of that complexity which evolution grows, one that genuinely runs counter to entropy and has thus far eluded proper analysis in information-theoretic terms. This complexity is reflected best in the increase in niches within the biosystem as a whole. Past and current artificial life simulations lack the resources with which to grow niches and so to reproduce evolution’s complexity. We propose a more suitable simulation design integrating environments and organisms, allowing old niches to change and new ones to emerge
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Christoph Adami (2002). What is Complexity? Bioessays 24 (12):1085-1094.
R. Badii (1997). Complexity: Hierarchical Structures and Scaling in Physics. Cambridge University Press.
J. Bronowski (1970). New Concepts in the Evolution of Complexity. Synthese 21 (2):18-35.
Seth Bullock & Mark A. Bedau, Exploring the Dynamics of Adaptation with Evolutionary Activity Plots.
Richard Dawkins (1997). Human Chauvinism. Review of Full House by Stephen Jay Gould. Evolution 51 (3).
Citations of this work BETA
Steven L. Peck (2013). Life as Emergent Agential Systems: Tendencies Without Teleology in an Open Universe. Zygon 48 (4):984-1000.
Similar books and articles
Börje Ekstig (2010). Complexity and Evolution: A Study of the Growth of Complexity in Organic and Cultural Evolution. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 15 (3):263-278.
Peter Jedlicka (2007). Physical Complexity and Cognitive Evolution. In Carlos Gershenson, Diederik Aerts & Bruce Edmonds (eds.), Worldviews, Science, and Us: Philosophy and Complexity. World Scientific. 221--231.
Börje Ekstig (2011). Biological and Cultural Evolution in a Common Universal Trend of Increasing Complexity. World Futures 66 (6):435-448.
Mr Debaprasad Mukherjee, Complexity, Biocomplexity, the Connectionist Conjecture and Ontology of Complexity.
Bruce Edmonds (1995). What is Complexity? - The Philosophy of Complexity Per Se with Application to Some Examples in Evolution. In [Book Chapter] (in Press).
David Sloan Wilson (2000). The Challenge of Understanding Complexity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):163-164.
Georg Schulze & Shuji Mori (1993). Increases in Environmental Entropy Demand Evolution. Acta Biotheoretica 41 (3):149-164.
Michael Lamport Commons & Sara Nora Ross (2008). The Hierarchical Complexity View of Evolution and History. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):399 – 405.
Alexey V. Melkikh (2008). Dna Computing, Computation Complexity and Problem of Biological Evolution Rate. Acta Biotheoretica 56 (4):285-295.
Daniel W. McShea (1991). Complexity and Evolution: What Everybody Knows. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 6 (3):303-324.
Added to index2011-03-16
Total downloads21 ( #95,808 of 1,692,423 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #111,548 of 1,692,423 )
How can I increase my downloads?