David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):51-71 (2011)
This essay explicates and evaluates the roles that fetal metaphysics and moral status play in Rosalind Hursthouse’s abortion ethics. It is motivated by Hursthouse’s puzzling claim in her widely anthologized paper Virtue Ethics and Abortion that fetal moral status and (by implication) its underlying metaphysics are in a way, fundamentally irrelevant to her position. The essay clarifies the roles that fetal ontology and moral status do in fact play in her abortion ethics. To this end, it presents and then develops her fetal metaphysics of the potential and actual human being, which she merely adumbrates in her more extensive treatment of abortion ethics in her book Beginning Lives. The essay then evaluates her fetal ontology in light of relevant research on fetal neural and psychological development. It concludes that her implied view that the late-stage fetus is an actual human being is defensible. The essay then turns to the analysis of late-stage abortions in her paper and argues that it is importantly incomplete
|Keywords||Abortion Fetal ontology Fetal moral status Applied virtue ethics Rosalind Hursthouse|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Stephen Buckle (1988). Arguing From Potential. Bioethics 2 (3):227–253.
J. A. Burgess & S. A. Tawia (1996). When Did You First Begin to Feel It? — Locating the Beginning of Human Consciousness. Bioethics 10 (1):1-26.
Stuart W. G. Derbyshire (1999). Locating the Beginnings of Pain. Bioethics 13 (1):1–31.
Michael J. Flower (1985). Neuromaturation of the Human Fetus. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (3):237-252.
Eugenie Gatens-Robinson (1992). A Defense of Women's Choice: Abortion and the Ethics of Care. Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):39-66.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nathan Nobis (2002). Who Needs the ’Actual Futures Pr/Nciple’?: Harmon on Abortion. Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (2):55-63.
Richard B. Miller (1989). On Transplanting Human Fetal Tissue: Presumptive Duties and the Task of Casuistry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (6):617-640.
David F. Walbert (1973). Abortion, Society, and the Law. Cleveland [Ohio]Press of Case Western Reserve University.
Rosalind Hursthouse (1999/2001). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press.
I. Glenn Cohen & Sadath Sayeed (2011). Fetal Pain, Abortion, Viability, and the Constitution. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (2):235-242.
Chris Meyers (2010). The Fetal Position: A Rational Approach to the Abortion Debate. Prometheus Books.
Mathew Lu (2011). Abortion and Virtue Ethics. In Stephen Napier (ed.), Persons, Moral Worth, and Embryos: A Critical Analysis of Pro-Choice Arguments. Springer
Added to index2010-06-09
Total downloads235 ( #3,490 of 1,700,235 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #69,042 of 1,700,235 )
How can I increase my downloads?