Graduate studies at Western
Minds and Machines 14 (4):433-440 (2004)
|Abstract||I consider three aspects in which machine learning and philosophy of science can illuminate each other: methodology, inductive simplicity and theoretical terms. I examine the relations between the two subjects and conclude by claiming these relations to be very close.|
|Keywords||inductive simplicity machine learning method philosophy of science theoretical terms|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Malcolm R. Forster (1999). How Do Simple Rules `Fit to Reality' in a Complex World? Minds and Machines 9 (4):543-564.
David Corfield (2010). Varieties of Justification in Machine Learning. Minds and Machines 20 (2):291-301.
Martin Možina, Jure Žabkar, Trevor Bench-Capon & Ivan Bratko (2005). Argument Based Machine Learning Applied to Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (1):53-73.
S. Russell (1991). Inductive Learning by Machines. Philosophical Studies 64 (October):37-64.
Jon Williamson (2004). A Dynamic Interaction Between Machine Learning and the Philosophy of Science. Minds and Machines 14 (4):539-549.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,770 of 722,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?