David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 140 (3):319-334 (2007)
Many of those who accept the universalist thesis that mereological composition is unrestricted also maintain that the folk typically restrict their quantifiers in such a way as to exclude strange fusions when they say things that appear to conflict with universalism. Despite its prima facie implausibility, there are powerful arguments for universalism. By contrast, there is remarkably little evidence for the thesis that strange fusions are excluded from the ordinary domain of quantification. Furthermore, this reconciliatory strategy seems hopeless when applied to the more fundamental conflict between universalism and the intuitions that tell against it.
|Keywords||Composition Folk Ontology Ontologese Universalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Saul A. Kripke (1982). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Harvard University Press.
Theodore Sider (2001). Four Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford University Press.
Saul A. Kripke (1980/1998). Naming and Necessity. Harvard University Press.
W. V. Quine (1960). Word and Object. The MIT Press.
David Lewis (1983). New Work for a Theory of Universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (December):343-377.
Citations of this work BETA
Daniel Z. Korman (2015). Fundamental Quantification and the Language of the Ontology Room. Noûs 49 (2):298-321.
David Rose & Jonathan Schaffer (2015). Folk Mereology is Teleological. Noûs 49 (3):n/a-n/a.
Daniel Z. Korman (2010). The Argument From Vagueness. Philosophy Compass 5 (10):891-901.
Robert Carry Osborne (2016). Debunking Rationalist Defenses of Common-Sense Ontology: An Empirical Approach. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (1):197-221.
Daniel Z. Korman (2009). Eliminativism and the Challenge From Folk Belief. Noûs 43 (2):242-264.
Similar books and articles
Daniel Z. Korman (2007). The Naive Conception of Material Objects: A Defense. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin
Gabriel Uzquiano (2006). The Price of Universality. Philosophical Studies 129 (1):137 - 169.
By Kristie Miller (2008). Endurantism, Diachronic Vagueness and the Problem of the Many. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (2):242–253.
Dan López de Sa (2006). Is 'Everything' Precise? Dialectica 60 (4):397–409.
Nikk Effingham (2011). Undermining Motivations for Universalism. Noûs 45 (4):696-713.
Nikk Effingham, Debunking a Mereological Myth: If Composition as Identity is True, Universalism Need Not Be.
Øystein Linnebo (2006). Sets, Properties, and Unrestricted Quantification. In Gabriel Uzquiano & Agustin Rayo (eds.), Absolute Generality. Oxford University Press
Michael Glanzberg (2006). Context and Unrestricted Quantification. In A. Rayo & G. Uzquiano (eds.), Absolute Generality. Oxford University Press 45--74.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads345 ( #5,411 of 1,796,448 )
Recent downloads (6 months)63 ( #9,374 of 1,796,448 )
How can I increase my downloads?