Graduate studies at Western
Locke Studies 10:61-84 (2010)
|Abstract||I defend an interpretation of Locke’s remarks on substratum according to which substrata not only have sensible qualities but are just familiar things and stuffs: horses, stones, gold, wax, and snow. The supporting relation that holds between substrata and the qualities that they support is simply the familiar relation of having, or instantiating, which holds between a particular substance and its qualities. I address the obvious objection to the interpretation -- namely, that it cannot be reconciled with Locke’s claim that the idea substratum is an obscure, confused idea of we know not what -- and I identify numerous textual parallels between Locke's discussions of substrata and particular substances which strongly support the deflationary interpretation.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert A. Wilson (2002). Locke's Primary Qualities. Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2):201-228.
Michael Jacovides (2007). Locke on the Propria of Body. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (3):485 – 511.
Lex Newman (2000). Locke on the Idea of Substratum. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81 (3):291–324.
I. C. Tipton (ed.) (1977). Locke on Human Understanding: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press.
Theodore Sider (2006). Bare Particulars. Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.
Robert A. Wilson (forthcoming). Primary and Secondary Qualities. In Matthew Stuart (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Locke. Blackwell.
Gábor Forrai (2010). Locke on Substance in General. Locke Studies 10:27-59.
Gábor Forrai (2010). Locke on Substance in General. Locke Studies 10 (27):59.
Added to index2009-08-22
Total downloads115 ( #5,909 of 723,483 )
Recent downloads (6 months)23 ( #5,531 of 723,483 )
How can I increase my downloads?