Locke on Substratum: A Deflationary Interpretation
Locke Studies 10:61-84 (2010)
| Abstract | I defend an interpretation of Locke’s remarks on substratum according to which substrata not only have sensible qualities but are just familiar things and stuffs: horses, stones, gold, wax, and snow. The supporting relation that holds between substrata and the qualities that they support is simply the familiar relation of having, or instantiating, which holds between a particular substance and its qualities. I address the obvious objection to the interpretation -- namely, that it cannot be reconciled with Locke’s claim that the idea substratum is an obscure, confused idea of we know not what -- and I identify numerous textual parallels between Locke's discussions of substrata and particular substances which strongly support the deflationary interpretation. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Locke substratum | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
|
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Robert A. Wilson (2002). Locke's Primary Qualities. Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2):201-228.
Michael Jacovides (2007). Locke on the Propria of Body. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (3):485 – 511.
Lex Newman (2000). Locke on the Idea of Substratum. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81 (3):291–324.
I. C. Tipton (ed.) (1977). Locke on Human Understanding: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press.
Theodore Sider (2006). Bare Particulars. Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.
Robert A. Wilson (forthcoming). Primary and Secondary Qualities. In Matthew Stuart (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Locke. Blackwell.
Gábor Forrai (2010). Locke on Substance in General. Locke Studies 10:27-59.
Gábor Forrai (2010). Locke on Substance in General. Locke Studies 10 (27):59.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-08-22Total downloads92 ( #7,394 of 551,007 )Recent downloads (6 months)19 ( #3,152 of 551,007 )How can I increase my downloads? |

