The Norton-type lipschitz-indeterministic systems and elastic phenomena: Indeterminism as an artefact of infinite idealizations
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The singularity arising from the violation of the Lipschitz condition in the simple Newtonian system proposed recently by Norton (2003) is so fragile as to be completely and irreparably destroyed by slightly relaxing certain (infinite) idealizations pertaining to elastic phenomena in this model. I demonstrate that this is also true for several other Lipschitz-indeterministic systems, which, unlike Norton's example, have no surface curvature singularities. As a result, indeterminism in these systems should rather be viewed as an artefact of certain infinite idealizations essential for these models, depriving them of much of their intended metaphysical import.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Marij van Strien (2014). The Norton Dome and the Nineteenth Century Foundations of Determinism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (1):167-185.
Samuel C. Fletcher (2012). What Counts as a Newtonian System? The View From Norton's Dome. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (3):275-297.
Chunghyoung Lee (2013). The Staccato Roller Coaster: A Simple Physical Model of the Staccato Run. Synthese 190 (3):549-562.
Similar books and articles
Joseph S. Alper & Mark Bridger (1998). Newtonian Supertasks: A Critical Analysis. Synthese 114 (2):355-369.
Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (1999). Earman and Norton on Supertasks That Generate Indeterminism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):137 - 141.
John Earman & John D. Norton (1998). Comments on Laraudogoitia's 'Classical Particle Dynamics, Indeterminism and a Supertask'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):123-133.
Robert Batterman (2005). Critical Phenomena and Breaking Drops: Infinite Idealizations in Physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 36 (2):225-244.
Daniel Steel (2005). Indeterminism and the Causal Markov Condition. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (1):3-26.
John D. Norton (2012). Approximation and Idealization: Why the Difference Matters. Philosophy of Science 79 (2):207-232.
Chuang Liu (1999). Explaining the Emergence of Cooperative Phenomena. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):106.
Alexandre Korolev (2007). Indeterminism, Asymptotic Reasoning, and Time Irreversibility in Classical Physics. Philosophy of Science 74 (5):943-956.
John Norton (2014). Infinite Idealizations. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 17:197-210.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads86 ( #38,845 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #183,615 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?