David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 165 (3):347 - 357 (2008)
Classical Gricean pragmatics is usually conceived as dealing with far-side pragmatics, aimed at computing implicatures. It involves reasoning about why what was said, was said. Near-side pragmatics, on the other hand, is pragmatics in the service of determining, together with the semantical properties of the words used, what was said. But this raises the specter of ‘the pragmatic circle.’ If Gricean pragmatics seeks explanations for why someone said what they did, how can there be Gricean pragmatics on the near-side? Gricean reasoning seems to require what is said to get started. But then if Gricean reasoning is needed to get to what is said, we have a circle.
|Keywords||Near-side pragmatics Far-side pragmatics Reflexive content Locutionary content Critical referentialism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Herman Cappelen (2005). Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Blackwell Pub..
David Kaplan (1977/1989). Demonstratives. In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. 481-563.
Kepa Korta & John Perry (2007). How to Say Things with Words. In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), John Searle's Philosophy of Language: Force, Meaning, and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
John Perry (2009). Reference and Reflexivity. Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Francois Recanati (2004). Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Eros Corazza (2012). Same-Saying, Pluri-Propositionalism, and Implicatures. Mind and Language 27 (5):546-569.
Mark Phelan (2014). Experimental Pragmatics: An Introduction for Philosophers. Philosophy Compass 9 (1):66-79.
Similar books and articles
Jessica de Villiers & Robert J. Stainton, Differential Pragmatic Abilities and Autism Spectrum Disorders: The Case of Pragmatic Determinants of Literal Content.
Frederic Goubier & Nausicaa Pouscoulous (2011). Virtus Sermonis and the Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction. Vivarium 49 (1-3):214-239.
Carole J. Lee (2006). Gricean Charity: The Gricean Turn in Psychology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (2):193-218.
Bart Geurts (2010). Quantity Implicatures. Cambridge University Press.
Kepa Korta & John Perry (2006). Three Demonstrations and a Funeral. Mind and Language 21 (2):166–186.
Michiel Leezenberg (2009). Part I. Gricean Themes: Gricean and Confucian Pragmatics: A Contrastive Analysis. In Dingfang Shu & Ken Turner (eds.), Contrasting Meanings in Languages of the East and West. Peter Lang.
Bart Geurts (2009). Scalar Implicature and Local Pragmatics. Mind and Language 24 (1):51-79.
Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.) (2007). Pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads55 ( #33,609 of 1,413,271 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #67,681 of 1,413,271 )
How can I increase my downloads?