Minds and Machines 16 (3):289-302 (2006)
|Abstract||We further develop the mathematical theory of causal interventions, extending earlier results of Korb, Twardy, Handfield, & Oppy, (2005) and Spirtes, Glymour, Scheines (2000). Some of the skepticism surrounding causal discovery has concerned the fact that using only observational data can radically underdetermine the best explanatory causal model, with the true causal model appearing inferior to a simpler, faithful model (cf. Cartwright, (2001). Our results show that experimental data, together with some plausible assumptions, can reduce the space of viable explanatory causal models to one.|
|Keywords||Causal models Causal discovery Faithfulness Simplicity Intervention Bayesian networks Underdetermination|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Frederick Eberhardt & Richard Scheines (2007). Interventions and Causal Inference. Philosophy of Science 74 (5):981-995.
Charles R. Twardy, Kevin B. Korb, Graham Oppy & Toby Handfield (2011). Actual Causation by Probabilistic Active Paths. Philosophy of Science 78 (5):900-913.
Caren A. Frosch, Teresa McCormack, David A. Lagnado & Patrick Burns (2012). Are Causal Structure and Intervention Judgments Inextricably Linked? A Developmental Study. Cognitive Science 36 (2):261-285.
Peter Spirtes (2005). Graphical Models, Causal Inference, and Econometric Models. Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (1):3-34.
Brian Ellis (2000). Causal Laws and Singular Causation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):329-351.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,233 of 722,722 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,722 )
How can I increase my downloads?