Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (3):313-324 (2002)
|Abstract||The social and scientific debate overfunctional foods has two focal points: one isthe issue of the reliability andtrustworthiness of the claims connected withfunctional foods. You don't have to be asuspicious person to be skeptical vis-à-visthe rather exorbitant claims of most functionalfoods. They promise prevention against allkinds of illnesses and enhancement ofachievements like memory and vision, withouthaving been tested adequately. The second issueis the issue of the socio-cultural dimension offunctional foods and their so calleddetrimental effect on the social and normativemeanings of food, with possibly the effect thatfood in general will be treated like amedicine, with radical individualizing effects.Finally, individuals would only be allowed toeat what their gene-profile prescribes them. Inthis paper, it is argued that food is anon-neutral public good that contributesinherently to the identity of vulnerableindividuals. It should be treated in anon-neutral, but impartial way. Therefore,politics need to intervene in food markets froma justice and ethical point of view with twoaims in mind. The first aim (as an implicationof justice considerations) should be toestablish safety conditions, and to identifyand monitor food safety standards in anobjective and impartial way. Preventive medicalclaims of foods should be allowed on the basisof appropriate and objective testing methods.The second aim (as an implication of ethicalconsiderations) should be to shape conditionsfor a cohabitation of various food styles,including that of functional foods. Moreover,the cultural and symbolic meaning of food in apluralistic society requires that the differentfood styles find some modus of living andinteracting together. As long as functionalfoods comply with safety standards and respectother food styles, they should be allowed onthe market, just like any other food product.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Donald B. Thompson (forthcoming). Natural Food and the Pastoral: A Sentimental Notion? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.
Whiton S. Paine & Mary Lou Galantino (2007). Biomarketing Ethics, Functional Foods, Health, and Minors. Journal of Philosophical Research 32:163-176.
Assya Pascalev (2003). You Are What You Eat: Genetically Modified Foods, Integrity, and Society. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (6):583-594.
Kirsten Hansen (2004). Does Autonomy Count in Favor of Labeling Genetically Modified Food? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (1):67-76.
David Waltner-Toews (1991). One Ecosystem, One Food System: The Social and Ecological Context of Food Safety Strategies. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (1).
Tatiana Klompenhouwer & Henk van den Belt (2003). Regulating Functional Foods in the European Union: Informed Choice Versus Consumer Protection? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (6):545-556.
Doris Schroeder (2007). Public Health, Ethics, and Functional Foods. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (3).
Lotte Holm (2003). Food Health Policies and Ethics: Lay Perspectives on Functional Foods. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (6):531-544.
Miltos Liakopoulos & Doris Schroeder (2003). Trust and Functional Foods. New Products, Old Issues. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (1):41-52.
David Kaplan (2007). What's Wrong with Functional Foods? Journal of Philosophical Research 32:177-187.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #123,036 of 549,070 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,070 )
How can I increase my downloads?