David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 114 (1-2):107 - 134 (2003)
The main goal of Sider’s book, Four-Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time, is to show why his version of four- dimensionalism, the stage-theory, on balance, should be preferred over its main competitors: it is, in his view, the theory which presents the best unified treatment of a wide range of central metaphysical puzzles; the theory which has, on balance, “the most important advantages and the least serious drawbacks” (ibid., p. 140). I argue in this paper that, when we add up all the evidence for and against the stage-theory, a different assessment of the dialectical situation recommends itself. As it turns out, everything depends on the argument from vagueness, the dialectical fulcrum of Sider’s book. If it were not for the argument from vagueness (so I suggest in outline in Section 2 of this paper), the situation would be relatively even-handed between the three-dimensionalist and the four-dimensionalist. But the argument from vagueness (as I show in more detail in Section 3) suffers from a crucial, and arguably fatal, weakness: no independent, non-question-begging justification has been provided for its most controversial premise, the non-vagueness of mereological composition.
|Keywords||Four dimensionalism Three dimensionalism Endurance Perdurance Stage theory Argument from vagueness Mereology Unrestricted mereological composition|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Daniel Z. Korman (2010). The Argument From Vagueness. Philosophy Compass 5 (10):891-901.
Chad Carmichael (2011). Vague Composition Without Vague Existence. Noûs 45 (2):315-327.
Ofra Magidor (2015). Endurantism Vs. Perdurantism?: A Debate Reconsidered. Noûs 50 (2):n/a-n/a.
Ross Inman (2014). Neo-Aristotelian Plenitude. Philosophical Studies 168 (3):583-597.
David Liebesman & Matti Eklund (2007). Sider on Existence. Noûs 41 (3):519–528.
Similar books and articles
Katherine Hawley, Critical Study of Four-Dimensionalism, by Theodore Sider, Oxford University Press 2001, ISBN 0 19 924443 X, Hardback.
Theodore Sider (2000). The Stage View and Temporary Intrinsics. Analysis 60 (1):84 - 88.
Theodore Sider (1996). All the World's a Stage. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (3):433 – 453.
Yuri Balashov (2000). Relativity and Persistence. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):562.
Josh Parsons (2000). Must a Four-Dimensionalist Believe in Temporal Parts? The Monist 83 (3):399-418.
Yuri Balashov (2002). On Stages, Worms, and Relativity. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 50:223-.
Theodore Sider (2001). Four Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford University Press.
Theodore Sider (1997). Four-Dimensionalism. Philosophical Review 106 (2):197-231.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads133 ( #28,401 of 1,907,141 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #38,367 of 1,907,141 )
How can I increase my downloads?