David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (1):39 – 48 (2002)
Science has more to offer than just knowledge of nature; it can give us understanding of nature as well. Epistemology of science is usually focused on knowledge and the criteria of justification, while paying little attention to understanding. In a reversal of this emphasis, this article is more about scientific understanding. I argue that the hallmarks of understanding are similar to an aesthetic feature associated with literature, music, and the visual arts. It is the feature described as coherence, harmony, and inevitability of fit. Aesthetics thus plays an epistemic role in science as an indication of understanding.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Lorraine Code (1987). Epistemic Responsibility. Published for Brown University Press by University Press of New England.
Richard Feynman (1967). The Character of Physical Law. The MIT Press.
Catherine Elgin (1996). Considered Judgment. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Henk W. de Regt (2001). Spacetime Visualisation and the Intelligibility of Physical Theories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (2):243-265.
Peter Kosso (2000). Fundamental and Accidental Symmetries. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (2):109 – 121.
Citations of this work BETA
Carlo Cellucci (2015). Mathematical Beauty, Understanding, and Discovery. Foundations of Science 20 (4):339-355.
Cain S. Todd (2008). Unmasking the Truth Beneath the Beauty: Why the Supposed Aesthetic Judgements Made in Science May Not Be Aesthetic at All. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (1):61 – 79.
Halfdan Petursson, Linn Getz, Johann A. Sigurdsson & Irene Hetlevik (2009). Can Individuals with a Significant Risk for Cardiovascular Disease Be Adequately Identified by Combination of Several Risk Factors? Modelling Study Based on the Norwegian HUNT 2 Population. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (1):103-109.
Similar books and articles
Salim Kemal & Ivan Gaskell (eds.) (1993). Landscape, Natural Beauty, and the Arts. Cambridge University Press.
Henk W. de Regt (1999). Ludwig Boltzmann's Bildtheorie and Scientific Understanding. Synthese 119 (1-2):113-134.
Stephen R. Grimm (2006). Is Understanding a Species of Knowledge? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (3):515-535.
Erik Weber (1996). Explaining, Understanding and Scientific Theories. Erkenntnis 44 (1):1 - 23.
Nancy J. Nersessian (ed.) (1987). The Process of Science: Contemporary Philosophical Approaches to Understanding Scientific Practice. Distributors for the United States and Canada, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
J. D. Trout (2007). The Psychology of Scientific Explanation. Philosophy Compass 2 (3):564–591.
Michael Strevens (2013). No Understanding Without Explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):510-515.
Henk W. De Regt & Dennis Dieks (2005). A Contextual Approach to Scientific Understanding. Synthese 144 (1):137 - 170.
Moti Mizrahi (2012). Idealizations and Scientific Understanding. Philosophical Studies 160 (2):237-252.
Peter Kosso (2007). Scientific Understanding. Foundations of Science 12 (2):173-188.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #80,927 of 1,725,806 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,283 of 1,725,806 )
How can I increase my downloads?