David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):502-503 (2005)
Although Steeles & Belpaeme's (S&B) results may be useful for development of technical devices, their significance for behavioral sciences is very limited. This is because the question the authors asked was “Why do people use similar words in a similar way?” rather than “How can similar words stand for similar experience?” The main problem is not shared word usage, but shared references.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter F. Dominey (2005). Toward a Construction-Based Account of Shared Intentions in Social Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):696-696.
Adam Morton (2000). Heuristics All the Way Up? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):758-759.
Sébastien Dubé & Henri Cohen (1999). Experimental and Theoretical Evidence for a Similar Localization of Words Encoded Through Different Modalities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):285-286.
Patricia Louise Loughlan, 'You Wouldn't Steal a Car': Intellectual Property and the Language of Theft.
Rochelle S. Newman (2000). Not All Neighborhood Effects Are Created Equal. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):343-343.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #347,727 of 1,911,732 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,113 of 1,911,732 )
How can I increase my downloads?