Studia Logica 78 (1-2):279 - 291 (2004)
|Abstract||Adams and Dziobiak proved that any finite-to-finite universal quasivariety must be Q-universal, and then asked whether a somewhat weaker hypothesis could lead to the same conclusion. We show that their original hypothesis cannot be weakened to its naturally extreme form.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
RW Batterman (2000). Multiple Realizability and Universality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (1):115-145.
Robert G. Turnbull (1960). Imperatives, Logic, and Moral Obligation. Philosophy of Science 27 (4):374-390.
Bernd Carsten Stahl (forthcoming). Discourses on Information Ethics: The Claim to Universality. Ethics and Information Technology.
John Earman (1978). The Universality of Laws. Philosophy of Science 45 (2):173-181.
Robert Rynasiewicz (1986). The Universality of Laws in Space and Time. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:66 - 75.
Theresa Waynand Tobin (2005). The Non-Modularity of Moral Knowledge. Social Philosophy Today 21:33-50.
Tom L. Beauchamp (2003). A Defense of the Common Morality. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (3):259-274.
Carroll Guen Hart (1993). "Power in the Service of Love": John Dewey's Logic and the Dream of a Common Language. Hypatia 8 (2):190 - 214.
Stephen H. Phillips (2002). Does Classicism Explain Universality? Minds and Machines 12 (3):423-434.
Jon Simons (2001). Democracy is a Failure Worthy of Infinite Repetition. Critical Horizons 2 (1):127-148.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?