David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):147-169 (2008)
Gödel's philosophical views were to a significant extent influenced by the study not only of Leibniz or Husserl, but also of Kant. Both Gödel and Kant aimed at the secure foundation of philosophy, the certainty of knowledge and the solvability of all meaningful problems in philosophy. In this paper, parallelisms between the foundational crisis of metaphysics in Kant's view and the foundational crisis of mathematics in Gödel's view are elaborated, especially regarding the problem of finding the “secure path of a science” for both mathematics and philosophy. Gödel's temporal subjectivism and metaphysical conceptual objectivism are presented as positively or negatively motivated by Kant's viewpoints. A remark on Gödel's collapse of modalities (in accordance with the collapse of objective time) is added.
|Keywords||conceptual objectivism collapse of modalities foundations of mathematics Gödel's philosophy Kant metaphysics temporal subjectivism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
C. Anthony Anderson (1990). Some Emendations of Gödel's Ontological Proof. Faith and Philosophy 7 (3):291-303.
Tobias Chapman (1995). Goedel on Kantian Idealism and Time. Idealistic Studies 25 (2):129-139.
Michael Detlefsen (1993). Hilbert's Formalism. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 47 (186):285-304.
Michael Friedman (1992). Kant and the Exact Sciences. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Margit Ruffing (2010). Kant-Bibliographie 2008. Kant-Studien 101 (4):487-538.
Similar books and articles
Hao Wang (1995). Time in Philosophy and in Physics: From Kant and Einstein to Gödel. Synthese 102 (2):215 - 234.
Panu Raatikainen (2005). On the Philosophical Relevance of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 59 (4):513-534.
Charles Parsons (2010). Gödel and Philosophical Idealism. Philosophia Mathematica 18 (2):166-192.
Richard Tieszen (1992). Kurt Godel and Phenomenology. Philosophy of Science 59 (2):176-194.
Pierre Cassou-Noguès (2005). Gödel and 'the Objective Existence' of Mathematical Objects. History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (3):211-228.
Richard L. Tieszen (2011). After Gödel: Platonism and Rationalism in Mathematics and Logic. Oxford University Press.
Matthias Baaz (ed.) (2011). Kurt Gödel and the Foundations of Mathematics: Horizons of Truth. Cambridge University Press.
Roman Murawski (1997). Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems and Computer Science. Foundations of Science 2 (1):123-135.
Mark Steiner (2001). Wittgenstein as His Own Worst Enemy: The Case of Gödel's Theorem. Philosophia Mathematica 9 (3):257-279.
Gabriella Crocco (2003). Gödel, Carnap and the Fregean Heritage. Synthese 137 (1-2):21 - 41.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads85 ( #18,740 of 1,410,151 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #57,864 of 1,410,151 )
How can I increase my downloads?