Graduate studies at Western
Synthesis Philosophica 14 (1999):45-52 (1999)
|Abstract||Quine rejects intensional Platonism and, with it, also rejects attributes (properties) as designations of predicates. He pragmatically accepts extensional Platonism, but conceives of classes as merely auxiliary entities needed to express some laws of set theory. At the elementary logical level, Quine develops an “ontologically innocent” logic of predicates. What in standard quantification theory is the work of variables is in the logic of predicates the work of a few functors that operate on predicates themselves: variables are eliminated. This “predicate functor logic” may be conceived as a peculiar sort of Platonism - ontologically neutral, reduced to schematized linguistic forms.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lloyd P. Gerson (2005). What is Platonism? Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (3):253-276.
Mark Balaguer (1998). Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
Nino B. Cocchiarella (1992). Conceptual Realism Versus Quine on Classes and Higher-Order Logic. Synthese 90 (3):379 - 436.
Greg Restall (2003). Just What is Full-Blooded Platonism? Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):82--91.
Mark Balaguer, Platonism in Metaphysics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Lieven Decock (2004). Inception of Quine's Ontology. History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (2):111-129.
Joel I. Friedman (2005). Modal Platonism: An Easy Way to Avoid Ontological Commitment to Abstract Entities. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (3):227 - 273.
David Liggins (2008). Quine, Putnam, and the 'Quine-Putnam' Indispensability Argument. Erkenntnis 68 (1):113 - 127.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1990). Quine's Relativism. Ratio 3 (2):142-149.
Added to index2009-06-06
Total downloads31 ( #45,055 of 754,610 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,372 of 754,610 )
How can I increase my downloads?