Galileo and the scientific revolution of the seventeenth century
Philosophical Review 52 (4):333-348 (1943)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDaniel Garber (2004). On the Frontlines of the Scientific Revolution: How Mersenne Learned to Love Galileo. Perspectives on Science 12 (2):135-163.
Per Str⊘Mholm (1975). I. Galileo and the Scientific Revolution. Inquiry 18 (3):345-353.
Per Strømholm (1975). I. Galileo and the Scientific Revolution. Inquiry 18 (3):345 – 353.
Per Str (1975). I. Galileo and the Scientific Revolution. Inquiry 18 (3):345 – 353.
William Wallace (1990). Duhem and Koyré on Domingo de Soto. Synthese 83 (2):239 - 260.
Yaakov Zik (2001). Science and Instruments: The Telescope as a Scientific Instrument at the Beginning of the Seventeenth Century. Perspectives on Science 9 (3):259-284.
Samuel Leslie Bethell (1951). The Cultural Revolution of the Seventeenth Century. London, D. Dobson.
R. M. (2003). Leibniz and the Post-Copernican Universe. Koyre Revisited. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):309-327.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads169 ( #1,926 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #7,667 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
