Public Health Ethics 5 (3):296-310 (2012)
|Abstract||The public purse is responsible for funding almost all autism spectrum disorders (ASD) research in Canada (as per Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CIHR]) and for providing some of the existing services and supports for this population. In this article, we consider various reasons why Canada should be concerned to ensure a more equitable distribution of relevant public funding for ASD research than is currently the case to meet the express needs and interests of the diversity of autism stakeholders. As such, we report data to show that CIHR-supported ASD research from the period of 2000–2010 demonstrates a bias focussed on the aetiology of the condition revealing a disproportionate emphasis on only two (Biomedical and Clinical) out of the four research pillars avowed by CIHR, with a comparative lack of fiscal resources committed to Health Systems and Services and Population and Public Health research. We advance certain normative and prudential reasons for funding more Health Systems and Services and Population and Public Health ASD research in Canada. In our view, this would seem to follow from CIHR’s official mandate ‘as a flexible mechanism that will continually align health research funding with changes in the manner in which health problems and opportunities are identified, understood and addressed’|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Similar books and articles
James Robert Brown (2002). Funding, Objectivity and the Socialization of Medical Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):295--308.
Lorian E. Hardcastle, Katherine L. Record, Peter D. Jacobson & Lawrence O. Gostin (2011). Improving the Population's Health: The Affordable Care Act and the Importance of Integration. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):317-327.
P. Langat, D. Pisartchik, D. Silva, C. Bernard, K. Olsen, M. Smith, S. Sahni & R. Upshur (2011). Is There a Duty to Share? Ethics of Sharing Research Data in the Context of Public Health Emergencies. Public Health Ethics 4 (1):4-11.
Alberto Infante (1995). Setting Priorities in the Spanish Health Care System. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (6):595-606.
Angus Dawson (ed.) (2011). Public Health Ethics: Key Concepts and Issues in Policy and Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Mathieu Albert, Suzanne Laberge & Brian Hodges (2009). Boundary-Work in the Health Research Field: Biomedical and Clinician Scientists' Perceptions of Social Science Research. [REVIEW] Minerva 47 (2):171-194.
S. Pomfret, Q. A. Karim & S. R. Benatar (2010). Inclusion of Adolescent Women in Microbicide Trials: A Public Health Imperative! Public Health Ethics 3 (1):39-50.
Simone van der Burg (2011). Taking the “Soft Impacts” of Technology Into Account: Broadening the Discourse in Research Practice. Social Epistemology 23 (3):301-316.
Thomas May (2005). Funding Agendas: Has Bioterror Defense Been Over-Prioritized? American Journal of Bioethics 5 (4):34 – 44.
T. M. Wilkinson (2010). Community, Public Health and Resource Allocation. Public Health Ethics 3 (3):267-271.
Michael McDonald (1997). Business Ethics in Canada: Integration and Interdisciplinarity. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (6):635-643.
S. -A. Chong, B. J. Capps, M. Subramaniam, T. C. Voo & A. V. Campbell (2010). Clinical Research in Times of Pandemics. Public Health Ethics 3 (1):35-38.
Tadeusz Tollocako (2000). Ethical Implications in the Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in Poland. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):63-70.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-12-07
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?