David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):535-548 (2003)
In 1992, James Keenan put forward a renewed interpretation of the development of Aquinas’s thought to the effect that he shifted from an intellectual determinism in his early works, to an understanding of the autonomy of the will in the Prima Secundae of the Summa theologiae; this autonomy is the ground for Keenan’s (and others’) distinction between moral goodness and moral rightness. The present essay analyzes Keenan’s interpretation in terms of the body of criticism that it has generated over the past ten years. In particular, it highlights five important implications that Keenan draws from his theory of the will’s autonomy: the separation of volition from knowledge in the dynamic of freedom, the virtue of charity as formal and non-specific, the moral neutrality of the acquired virtues, the two measures of moral action, and sin as moral “badness.”
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stefan Sencerz (1995). Personal Goodness and Moral Facts. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:481-498.
Alastair Norcross (1997). Good and Bad Actions. Philosophical Review 106 (1):1-34.
Alastair Norcross (2005). Contextualism for Consequentialists. Acta Analytica 20 (2):80-90.
Iskra Fileva (2008). The Neutrality of Rightness and the Indexicality of Goodness: Beyond Objectivity and Back Again. Ratio 21 (3):273-285.
Kevin M. Staley (1994). Goodness and Rightness in Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theologiae. Review of Metaphysics 48 (1):141-142.
Jacqueline Colby (2006). Consent: Moral Rightness Versus Non-Moral Goodness. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (3):69-71.
Richard Yetter Chappell (2012). Fittingness: The Sole Normative Primitive. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):684 - 704.
Oliver A. Johnson (1959). Rightness and Goodness. The Hague, Nijhoff.
Holly M. Smith (2010). Subjective Rightness. Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (2):64-110.
Oliver A. Johnson (1953). Rightness, Moral Obligation, and Goodness. Journal of Philosophy 50 (20):597-608.
Robert L. Schwager (1974). John Balguy on Rightness and Moral Goodness. Journal of Value Inquiry 8 (4):289-301.
Julian Fink (2007). Is the Right Prior to the Good? South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):143-149.
Liezl van Zyl (2009). Accidental Rightness. Philosophia 37 (1):91-104.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads10 ( #347,074 of 1,911,489 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,145 of 1,911,489 )
How can I increase my downloads?