David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Wil Waluchow & Stefan Sciaraffa (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law. OUP Oxford 22 (2013)
In Legality Scott Shapiro seeks to provide the motivation for the development of his own elaborate account of law by undertaking a critique of H.L.A. Hart's jurisprudential theory. Hart maintained that every legal system is underlain by a rule of recognition through which officials of the system identify the norms that belong to the system as laws. Shapiro argues that Hart's remarks on the rule of recognition are confused and that his model of lawis consequently untenable. Shapiro contends that a new approach is vital for progress in the philosophy of law and, with his lengthy presentation of his own Planning Theory of Law, he aspires to pioneer just such an approach. Except for a very terse observation in the final main section, this article does not directly assess the strengths and shortcomings of Shapiro's piquant planning theory. Instead, I defend Hart against Shapiro's charges and thereby undermine the motivation for the development of the planning theory
|Keywords||H.L.A. Hart legal positivism law morality Scott Shapiro Ronald Dworkin jurisprudence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Scott J. Shapiro (2007). The "Hart-Dworkin" Debate : A Short Guide for the Perplexed. In Arthur Ripstein (ed.), Ronald Dworkin. Cambridge University Press 22--49.
Scott Shapiro (2011). Legality. Harvard University Press.
Scott J. Shapiro (2009). Was Inclusive Legal Positivism Founded on a Mistake? Ratio Juris 22 (3):326-338.
Philip Schofield (2010). Jeremy Bentham and HLA Hart's ‘Utilitarian Tradition in Jurisprudence’. Jurisprudence 1 (2):147-167.
Leslie Green (2008). Positivism And The Inseparability Of Law And Morals. New York University Law Review 83:1035--1058.
Jules L. Coleman (ed.) (2000). Hart's Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco (2009). From Shared Agency to the Normativity of Law: Shapiro's and Coleman's Defence of Hart's Practice Theory of Rules Reconsidered. Law and Philosophy 28 (1):59 - 100.
F. Atria (1999). Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited. Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
John Gardner (2010). Hart on Legality, Justice and Morality. Jurisprudence 1 (2):253-265.
H. L. A. Hart (1994). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
Damiano Canale (2012). Looking for the Nature of Law: On Shapiro's Challenge. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 31 (4):409-441.
Neil MacCormick (1978). Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.
Danny Priel (2008). Sanction and Obligation in Hart's Theory of Law. Ratio Juris 21 (3):404-411.
Matthew H. Kramer (ed.) (2008). The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2012-07-17
Total downloads502 ( #2,630 of 1,941,076 )
Recent downloads (6 months)166 ( #575 of 1,941,076 )
How can I increase my downloads?