David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):91 - 102 (2011)
Anselmian theism holds that there necessarily exists a being, God, who is essentially unsurpassable in power, knowledge, goodness, and wisdom. This being is also understood to be the creator and sustainer of all that is. In contemporary analytic philosophy of religion, this role is generally understood as follows: God surveys the array of possible worlds, and in his wisdom selects exactly one for actualization, based on its axiological properties. In this paper, I discuss an under-appreciated challenge for this account of the Anselmian God's selection of a world. In particular, I urge that there are failures of comparability between various possible worlds, and I argue that, given certain assumptions, these failures threaten the rationality of God's choice of a world. To the extent that rationality is deemed necessary for unsurpassability, this result also challenges the core Anselmian notion that God is an unsurpassable being
|Keywords||God Possible world Incommensurability Incomparability Creation Actualization Trichotomy thesis Comparativism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Merrihew Adams (1972). Must God Create the Best? Philosophical Review 81 (3):317-332.
Michael Almeida (2011). Theistic Modal Realism. Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 3:1-15.
Thomas P. Flint (1983). The Problem of Divine Freedom. American Philosophical Quarterly 20 (3):255 - 264.
Stephen Grover (1998). Incommensurability and the Best of All Possible Worlds. The Monist 81 (4):648-668.
Theodore Guleserian (1983). God and Possible Worlds: The Modal Problem of Evil. Noûs 17 (2):221-238.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Klaas J. Kraay (2007). Divine Unsurpassability. Philosophia 35 (3-4):293-300.
Klaas J. Kraay (2006). God and the Hypothesis of No Prime Worlds. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 59 (1):49-68.
Klaas J. Kraay (2009). Can God Choose a World at Random? In Yujin Nagasawa & Erik J. Wielenberg (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan.
Paul Tidman (1993). The Epistemology of Evil Possibilities. Faith and Philosophy 10 (2):181-197.
Jesse R. Steinberg (2007). Leibniz, Creation and the Best of All Possible Worlds. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (3):123 - 133.
Klaas J. Kraay (2011). Theism and Modal Collapse. American Philosophical Quarterly 48 (4):361.
Klaas J. Kraay (2010). Theism, Possible Worlds, and the Multiverse. Philosophical Studies 147 (3):355 - 368.
Wes Morriston (2001). Omnipotence and the Anselmian God. Philo 4 (1):7-20.
Klaas J. Kraay (2008). Creation, Actualization and God's Choice Among Possible Worlds. Philosophy Compass 3 (4):854-872.
Yujin Nagasawa (2008). A New Defence of Anselmian Theism. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):577-596.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #60,179 of 1,101,812 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #41,591 of 1,101,812 )
How can I increase my downloads?