Cognitive Science 36 (5):837-841 (2012)
|Abstract||In a recent article published in this journal (van Deemter, Gatt, van der Sluis, & Power, 2012), the authors criticize the Incremental Algorithm (a well-known algorithm for the generation of referring expressions due to Dale & Reiter, 1995, also in this journal) because of its strong reliance on a pre-determined, domain-dependent Preference Order. The authors argue that there are potentially many different Preference Orders that could be considered, while often no evidence is available to determine which is a good one. In this brief note, however, we suggest (based on a learning curve experiment) that finding a Preference Order for a new domain may not be so difficult after all, as long as one has access to a handful of human-produced descriptions collected in a semantically transparent way. We argue that this is due to the fact that it is both more important and less difficult to get a good ordering of the head than of the tail of a Preference Order|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kees van Deemter, Albert Gatt, Ielka van der Sluis & Richard Power (2011). Generation of Referring Expressions: Assessing the Incremental Algorithm. Cognitive Science 36 (5):799-836.
Kees van Deemter, Albert Gatt, Ielka van der Sluis & Richard Power (2012). Assessing the Incremental Algorithm: A Response to Krahmer Et Al. Cognitive Science 36 (5):842-845.
Ruud Koolen, Martijn Goudbeek & Emiel Krahmer (2013). The Effect of Scene Variation on the Redundant Use of Color in Definite Reference. Cognitive Science 37 (2):395-411.
Markus Guhe (2012). Utility-Based Generation of Referring Expressions. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (2):306-329.
Donald Bruckner (2011). Second-Order Preferences and Instrumental Rationality. Acta Analytica 26 (4):367-385.
Yao-Tung Hsu, Tzung-Pei Hong & Shian-Shyong Tseng (2001). Learning Concepts by Arranging Appropriate Training Order. Minds and Machines 11 (3):399-415.
Michael Lockwood (1979). Singer on Killing and the Preference for Life. Inquiry 22 (1-4):157 – 170.
Sven Ove Hansson (2009). Preference-Based Choice Functions: A Generalized Approach. Synthese 171 (2).
Daniel M. Hausman (2005). Sympathy, Commitment, and Preference. Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):33-50.
Rosemary Lowry & Martin Peterson (2011). Pure Time Preference. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4):490-508.
Imtiaz H. Khan, Kees van Deemter & Graeme Ritchie (2011). Managing Ambiguity in Reference Generation: The Role of Surface Structure. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (2):211-231.
Johan E. Gustafsson (2011). An Extended Framework for Preference Relations. Economics and Philosophy 27 (3):360–367.
Sven Ove Hansson (1989). A New Semantical Approach to the Logic of Preference. Erkenntnis 31 (1):1 - 42.
Keith Lehrer (1997). Freedom, Preference and Autonomy. Journal of Ethics 1 (1):3-25.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-06-02
Total downloads2 ( #232,575 of 549,128 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,128 )
How can I increase my downloads?