Me, Myself and My Brain Implant: Deep Brain Stimulation Raises Questions of Personal Authenticity and Alienation
|Abstract||In this article, I explore select case studies of Parkinson patients treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) in light of the notions of alienation and authenticity. While the literature on DBS has so far neglected the issues of authenticity and alienation, I argue that interpreting these cases in terms of these concepts raises new issues for not only the philosophical discussion of neuro-ethics of DBS, but also for the psychological and medical approach to patients under DBS. In particular, I suggest that the experience of alienation and authenticity varies from patient to patient with DBS. For some, alienation can be brought about by neurointerventions because patients no longer feel like themselves. But, on the other hand, it seems alienation can also be cured by DBS as other patients experience their state of mind as authentic under treatment and retrospectively regard their former lives without stimulation as alienated. I argue that we must do further research on the relevance of authenticity and alienation to patients treated with DBS in order to gain a deeper philosophical understanding, and to develop the best evaluative criterion for the behavior of DBS patients.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Laura Klaming & Pim Haselager (forthcoming). Did My Brain Implant Make Me Do It? Questions Raised by DBS Regarding Psychological Continuity, Responsibility for Action and Mental Competence. Neuroethics.
Frederic Gilbert (2012). The Burden of Normality: From 'Chronically Ill' to 'Symptom Free'. New Ethical Challenges for Deep Brain Stimulation Postoperative Treatment. Journal of Medical Ethics 8:408-412.
Nir Lipsman & Walter Glannon (forthcoming). Brain, Mind and Machine: What Are the Implications of Deep Brain Stimulation for Perceptions of Personal Identity, Agency and Free Will? Bioethics.
Frederic Gilbert (forthcoming). Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression: Postoperative Feelings of Self-Estrangement, Suicide Attempt and Impulsive–Aggressive Behaviours. Neuroethics.
Maartje Schermer (forthcoming). Health, Happiness and Human Enhancement—Dealing with Unexpected Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuroethics.
Adrian Carter, Emily Bell, Eric Racine & Wayne Hall (2011). Ethical Issues Raised by Proposals to Treat Addiction Using Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuroethics 4 (2):129-142.
Cordelia Erickson-Davis (2011). Ethical Concerns Regarding Commercialization of Deep Brain Stimulation for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Bioethics 26 (8):440-446.
Frederic Gilbert & Ovadia Daniela (2011). Deep Brain Stimulation in the Media: Over-Optimistic Media Portrayals Calls for a New Strategy Involving Journalists and Scientifics in the Ethical Debate. Journal of Integrative in Neuroscience 5 (16).
Françoise Baylis (forthcoming). “I Am Who I Am”: On the Perceived Threats to Personal Identity From Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuroethics.
Veronica Johansson, Martin Garwicz, Martin Kanje, Helena Röcklinsberg, Jens Schouenborg, Anders Tingström & Ulf Görman (forthcoming). Beyond Blind Optimism and Unfounded Fears: Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression. Neuroethics.
Karsten Witt, Christiane Woopen, Jens Kuhn, Lars Timmermann & Mateusz Zurowski (forthcoming). Deep Brain Stimulation and the Search for Identity. Neuroethics.
Vilhjálmur Árnason (1994). Towards Authentic Conversations. Authenticity in the Patient-Professional Relationship. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (3).
F. Kraemer (forthcoming). Authenticity or Autonomy? When Deep Brain Stimulation Causes a Dilemma. Journal of Medical Ethics.
Farah Focquaert (forthcoming). Deep Brain Stimulation in Children: Parental Authority Versus Shared Decision-Making. Neuroethics.
Added to index2011-05-18
Total downloads40 ( #28,942 of 551,054 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,341 of 551,054 )
How can I increase my downloads?