Philo's Argument for Divine Amorality Reconsidered
Hume Studies 29 (2):283-304 (2003)
| Abstract | I first discuss Philo’s argument for divine amorality, and I distinguish it from his earlier criticisms of any inference from mundane data to divine benevolence. In Section 2, I diagnose deficiencies in two contrary interpretations of the argument for divine amorality. In Section 3, I offer three reasons for rejecting the surface meaning of this argument. In Section 4, I reveal Philo’s argument to be a sophisticated parody of both Cleanthes’ natural theology and his appeal to the passional influence of the design hypothesis. Philo, I argue, does not intend to show that the Deity is probably amoral; rather, he intends to show Cleanthes – by literally arguing with him “in his own way” (DNR 2.11; 145) – that the tools of Cleanthes’ ‘experimental theism’ can equally be wielded in service of a wholly incompatible view. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert Maydole (2005). On Metcalf 's Objections to the Modal Perfection Argument. Philo 8 (2):123-130.
Robert Maydole (2005). On Metcalf 's Objections to the Modal Perfection Argument. Philo 8 (2):123-130.
Daniel Murphy (2008). Quantum Cosmology and Theism. Philo 11 (1):93-119.
Leigh C. Vicens (2012). Divine Determinism, Human Freedom, and the Consequence Argument. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (2):145-155.
Graham Oppy (2003). The Devilish Complexities of Divine Simplicity. Philo 6 (1):10-22.
Graham Oppy (2002). Paley's Argument for Design. Philo 5 (2):161-173.
Michael Almeida (2008). Critically Muddled. Philo 11 (1):120-129.
Graham Oppy (2007). Maydole’s Modal Perfection Argument (Again). Philo: A Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):72-84.
Rich Foley (2006). Unnatural Religion. Hume Studies 32 (1):83-112.
Klaas J. Kraay (2003). Philo's Argument for Divine Amorality Reconsidered. Hume Studies 29 (2):283-304.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-11-19Total downloads12 ( #93,408 of 549,124 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,124 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
