Requirements, reasons, and Raz: Legal positivism and legal duties
Ethics 109 (2):375-407 (1999)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesVittorio Villa (2009). Inclusive Legal Positivism, Legal Interpretation, and Value-Judgments. Ratio Juris 22 (1):110-127.
Richard Paul Hamilton (2004). Might There Be Legal Reasons? Res Publica 10 (4).
Robert P. George (ed.) (1996). The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism. Oxford University Press.
Matthew H. Kramer (1999). In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law Without Trimmings. Oxford University Press.
Mario Jori (ed.) (1992). Legal Positivism. New York University Press.
Joseph Raz (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
F. Atria (1999). Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory Revisited. Law and Philosophy 18 (5):537-577.
Matthew H. Kramer (2009). Moral Principles and Legal Validity. Ratio Juris 22 (1):44-61.
Kenneth M. Ehrenberg (2011). The Anarchist Official: A Problem for Legal Positivism. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 36:89-112.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads37 ( #31,995 of 549,682 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,682 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
