David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (1):47 - 95 (2007)
The present paper is the result of a long struggle to understand how the notion of compositionality can be used to motivate the structure of a sentence. While everyone seems to have intuitions about which proposals are compositional and which ones are not, these intuitions generally have no formal basis. What is needed to make such arguments work is a proper understanding of what meanings are and how they can be manipulated. In particular, we need a definition of meaning that bans all mentioning of syntactic structure; it is not the task of semantics to state in which way things are put together in syntax. The present paper presents such a theory of meaning. This, in tandem with some minimal assumptions on the syntactic process (that there can be no deletion) yield surprisingly deep insights into natural language. First, it rehabilitates a lot of linguistic work as necessary on semantic grounds and defends it against potential claims of redundancy. For example, θ-roles and linking are an integral part of semantics, and not syntax. To assume the latter is to put the cart before the horse. Second, as a particular example we shall show that Dutch is not strongly context free even if weakly context free. To our knowledge, this is the first formal proof of this fact.
|Keywords||Compositionality Syntax Semantics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David R. Dowty, Robert Eugene Wall & Stanley Peters (1981). Introduction to Montague Semantics. Springer.
Kit Fine (2000). Neutral Relations. Philosophical Review 109 (1):1-33.
David R. Dowty (1982). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Philosophical Review 91 (2):290-295.
Citations of this work BETA
Peter Pagin (2010). Compositionality I: Definitions and Variants. Philosophy Compass 5 (3):250-264.
Marcus Kracht (2013). Are Logical Languages Compositional? Studia Logica 101 (6):1319-1340.
Anne Preller & Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh (2011). Semantic Vector Models and Functional Models for Pregroup Grammars. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20 (4):419-443.
Klaus Abels (2013). Comments on Hornstein. Mind and Language 28 (4):421-429.
Similar books and articles
Jean-Louis Hudry (2011). Aristotle on Meaning. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (3):253-280.
J. E. Miller (1985). Semantics and Syntax: Parallels and Connections. Cambridge University Press.
John Collins (2007). Syntax, More or Less. Mind 116 (464):805-850.
Paul Pietrowski (2002). Function and Concatenation. In Georg Peter & Gerhard Preyer (eds.), Logical Form and Language. Oxford University Press 91--117.
William E. Seager (1992). Thought and Syntax. Philosophy of Science Association 1992:481-491.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #114,246 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #84,767 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?