David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):98-99 (2007)
Consistent with the target article, recent evidence indicates that the superior colliculus (SC) is somehow involved in target selection. However, it is not yet known whether this function is inherent to the SC or inherited from its inputs, how the selection process occurs for different movements, or how target selection by the SC is related to covert selection (i.e., attention). (Published Online May 1 2007).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas C. Kane, Robert C. Richardson & Daniel W. Fong (1990). The Phenotype as the Level of Selection: Cave Organisms as Model Systems. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:151 - 164.
K. Doré-Mazars (1999). Where and When Does the What System Play a Role in Eye Movement Control? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):680-681.
Glyn Humphreys Christian Olivers, Dietmar Heinke, Hermann M.Ü & Ller (1999). Close Interactions Between “When” and “Where” in Saccade Target Selection: Multiple Saliency and Distractor Effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):693-694.
Nicholas S. Thompson (2000). Niche Construction and Group Selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):161-162.
Cécile Beauvillain & Pierre Pouget (2003). How Can Selection-for-Perception Be Decoupled From Selection-for-Action? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):478-479.
Michael C. Dorris & Douglas P. Munoz (1999). The Underrated Role of the “Move System” in Determining Saccade Latency. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):681-682.
E. Olivier, M. C. Dorris & D. P. Munoz (1999). Lateral Interactions in the Superior Colliculus, Not an Extended Fixation Zone, Can Account for the Remote Distractor Effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):694-695.
Susanne Watkins & Geraint Rees (2007). The Human Superior Colliculus: Neither Necessary, nor Sufficient for Consciousness? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):108-108.
John Schlag (2007). Should the Superficial Superior Colliculus Be Part of Merker's Mesodiencephalic System? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):105-106.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #346,198 of 1,692,753 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #182,248 of 1,692,753 )
How can I increase my downloads?