What James's philosophical orientation owed to Lotze
Philosophical Review 47 (5):517-526 (1938)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRoger Schmit (1990). Gebrauchssprache Und Logik. Eine Philosophiehistorische Notiz Zu Frege Und Lotze. History and Philosophy of Logic 11 (1):5-17.
Patrick McDonald (2008). Naturalistic Methodology in an Emerging Scientific Psychology: Lotze and Fechner in the Balance. Zygon 43 (3):605-625.
Frans Hovens (1997). Lotze and Frege: The Dating of the 'Kernsätze'∗. History and Philosophy of Logic 18 (1):17-31.
Robin D. Rollinger (2004). Hermann Lotze an Abstraction and Platonic Ideas. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):147-161.
Nikolay Milkov (2008). Russell's Debt to Lotze. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):186-193.
John W. Yolton (1972). Lotze's System of Philosophy. By George Santayana. Edited with an Introduction and Lotze Bibliography by Paul Grimley Kuntz. Indiana University Press, 1971. Pp. X + 274. $11.95. [REVIEW] Dialogue 11 (02):293-295.
Michael Dummett (1982). Objectivity and Reality in Lotze and Frege. Inquiry 25 (1):95 – 114.
Nikolay Milkov, Rudolf Hermann Lotze. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Otto F. Kraushaar (1939). Lotze as a Factor in the Development of James's Radical Empiricism and Pluralism. Philosophical Review 48 (5):455-471.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,239 of 549,013 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,013 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
