Teorema 2:5-19 (2012)
|Abstract||The fundamental assumption of Dummett’s and Prawitz’ proof-theoretic justification of deduction is that ‘if we have a valid argument for a complex statement, we can construct a valid argument for it which finishes with an application of one of the introduction rules governing its principal operator’. I argue that the assumption is flawed in this general version, but should be restricted, not to apply to arguments in general, but only to proofs. I also argue that Dummett’s and Prawitz’ project of providing a logical basis for metaphysics only relies on the restricted assumption.|
|Keywords||Michael Dummett Dag Prawitz Proof-theoretic semantics Theory of Meaning Realism vs Anti-Realism Metaphysics|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
N. Kurbis (2007). Pluralism and the Logical Basis of Metaphysics. In Logica Yearbook.
Peter Schroeder-Heister (2006). Validity Concepts in Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Synthese 148 (3):525 - 571.
Nils Kürbis (2008). Stable Harmony. In Peliš Michal (ed.), Logica Yearbook 2007.
Dag Prawitz (2006). Meaning Approached Via Proofs. Synthese 148 (3):507 - 524.
Enrico Moriconi (2012). Steps Towards a Proof-Theoretical Semantics. Topoi 31 (1):67-75.
Luca Tranchini (2012). Truth From a Proof-Theoretic Perspective. Topoi 31 (1):47-57.
Ruy J. G. B. de Queiroz (2008). On Reduction Rules, Meaning-as-Use, and Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Studia Logica 90 (2).
Ruy J. G. B. De Queiroz (2008). On Reduction Rules, Meaning-as-Use, and Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Studia Logica 90 (2):211 - 247.
WR Stirton (1997). Anti-Realism, Truth-Conditions and Verificationism. Mind 106 (424):697-716.
Alexander Miller (2003). The Significance of Semantic Realism. Synthese 136 (2):191 - 217.
Rupert Read (2002). Is ‘What is Time?’ A Good Question to Ask? Philosophy 77 (2):193-210.
Added to index2012-05-24
Total downloads36 ( #32,973 of 549,014 )
Recent downloads (6 months)31 ( #1,377 of 549,014 )
How can I increase my downloads?