Between the Bounds of experience and divine intuition: Kant's epistemic limits and Hegel's ambitions
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 50 (3):306 – 334 (2007)
Hegel seeks to overturn Kant's conclusion that our knowledge is restricted, or that we cannot have knowledge of things as they are in themselves. Understanding this Hegelian ambition requires distinguishing two Kantian characterizations of our epistemic limits: First, we can have knowledge only within the "bounds of experience". Second, we cannot have knowledge of objects that would be accessible only to a divine intellectual intuition, even though the faculty of reason requires us to conceive of such objects. Hegel aims to drive a wedge between these two characterizations, showing that we can have knowledge beyond Kant's bounds of experience, yet without need of divine intuition. And attention to such knowledge is supposed to show that we have no legitimate need to even conceive of divine intuition and its objects - and no need to conclude that our own knowledge is restricted by comparison, or that we cannot know things as they are in themselves. I focus here on the initial case Hegel uses to introduce this extended argument strategy: we can have more knowledge of natural kinds and laws than would be allowed by Kant's bounds of experience.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Karl Ameriks (1990). Kant, Fichte, and Short Arguments to Idealism. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 72 (1):63-85.
D. M. Armstrong (1983). What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge University Press.
Robert B. Brandom (1999). Some Pragmatist Themes in Hegel's Idealism: Negotiation and Administration in Hegel's Account of the Structure and Content of Conceptual Norms. European Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):164–189.
Fred I. Dretske (1977). Laws of Nature. Philosophy of Science 44 (2):248-268.
K. Dusing (1986). Asthetische Einbildungskraft und intuitiver Verstand. Kants Lehre und Hegels spekulativ-idealistische Umdeutung. Hegel-Studien 21:87-128.
Citations of this work BETA
Damion Buterin (2009). Knowledge, Freedom and Willing: Hegel on Subjective Spirit. Inquiry 52 (1):26 – 52.
Similar books and articles
Thomas J. Nenon (2008). Some Differences Between Kant's and Husserl's Conceptions of Transcendental Philosophy. Continental Philosophy Review 41 (4):427-439.
Jennifer Mensch (2011). Intuition and Nature in Kant and Goethe. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):431-453.
Andrew Chignell (2011). Real Repugnance and Our Ignorance of Things-in-Themselves: A Lockean Problem in Kant and Hegel. Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus 7:135-159.
Paul Redding (2010-11). Hegel's Anticipation of the Early History of Analytic Philosophy. The Owl of Minerva 42 (1–2):18–40.
Michael V. Antony (forthcoming). Can We Acquire Knowledge of Ultimate Reality? In Jeanine Diller & Asa Kasher (eds.), Models of God and Other Ultimate Realities. Springer.
Patrick Kain (2010). Practical Cognition, Intuition, and the Fact of Reason. In Benjamin Lipscomb & James Krueger (eds.), Kant's Moral Metaphysics: God, Freedom, and Immortality. de Gruyter. 211--230.
Robert R. Williams (2006). Hegel's Critique of Kant. The Owl of Minerva 38 (1/2):9-34.
Jeffrey Wilson (2000). Metaphysical Questions in Sartre's Phenomenological Ontology. Sartre Studies International 6 (2):46-61.
Simon Lumsden (2003). Satisfying the Demands of Reason: Hegel's Conceptualization of Experience. Topoi 22 (1):41-53.
Frode Kjosavik (2009). Kant on Geometrical Intuition and the Foundations of Mathematics. Kant-Studien 100 (1):1-27.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads55 ( #32,626 of 1,168,025 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #46,827 of 1,168,025 )
How can I increase my downloads?