David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Education 26 (2):131-145 (1997)
Abstract People rarely make the types of moral judgement evoked by Kohlberg's test when they make moral decisions in their everyday lives. The anticipated consequences of real?life moral decisions, to self and to others, may influence moral choices and the structure of moral reasoning. To understand real?life moral judgement we must attend to its functions, which, although they occasionally involve resolving hypothetical moral dilemmas like those on Kohlberg's test, more often involve promoting good social relations, upholding favourable self?concepts and justifying self?interested behaviour. We argue that a functional model of moral judgement and moral behaviour derived from evolutionary theory may supply a better account of real?life morality than the Kohlbergian model
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Shira Haviv & Patrick J. Leman (2002). Moral Decision-Making in Real Life: Factors Affecting Moral Orientation and Behaviour Justification. Journal of Moral Education 31 (2):121-140.
Dennis L. Krebs, Sandra C. Vermeulen, Kathy L. Denton & Jeremy I. Carpendale (1994). Gender and Perspective Differences in Moral Judgement and Moral Orientation. Journal of Moral Education 23 (1):17-26.
Gillian R. Wark & Dennis L. Krebs (2000). The Construction of Moral Dilemmas in Everyday Life. Journal of Moral Education 29 (1):5-21.
Roger R. Straughan (1975). Hypothetical Moral Situations. Journal of Moral Education 4 (3):183-189.
W. Pitt Derryberry & Stephen J. Thoma (2005). Functional Differences: Comparing Moral Judgement Developmental Phases of Consolidation and Transition. Journal of Moral Education 34 (1):89-106.
Maike Albertzart (2013). Principle-Based Moral Judgement. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):339-354.
Michael Philips (1985). Normative Contexts and Moral Decision. Journal of Business Ethics 4 (4):233 - 237.
Richard N. Williams & Edwin E. Gantt (2012). Felt Moral Obligation and the Moral Judgement–Moral Action Gap: Toward a Phenomenology of Moral Life. Journal of Moral Education 41 (4):417-435.
Pablo Fernandez-Berrocal & Natalio Extremera (2005). About Emotional Intelligence and Moral Decisions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):548-549.
James R. Rest, Darcia Narvaez, Stephen J. Thoma & Muriel J. Bebeau (2000). A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach to Morality Research. Journal of Moral Education 29 (4):381-395.
Dorothy Rulon (1992). The Just Community: A Method for Staff Development. Journal of Moral Education 21 (3):217-224.
Lawrence J. Walker & Thomas J. Moran (1991). Moral Reasoning in a Communist Chinese Society. Journal of Moral Education 20 (2):139-155.
Liangkang Ni (2009). Moral Instinct and Moral Judgment. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (2):238-250.
Michael J. Pardales (2002). "So, How Did You Arrive at That Decision?" Connecting Moral Imagination and Moral Judgement. Journal of Moral Education 31 (4):423-437.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads9 ( #163,492 of 1,099,914 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #190,037 of 1,099,914 )
How can I increase my downloads?